KAWASAKI ZZR600 (1990 - 2007) Review

Highlights

  • A great all-rounder when launched
  • Screaming 14000rpm redline
  • Comfortable and practical for long distances

At a glance

Owners' reliability rating: 4.6 out of 5 (4.6/5)
Annual servicing cost: £160
Power: 99 bhp
Seat height: Low (30.7 in / 780 mm)
Weight: Medium (401 lbs / 182 kg)

Prices

New N/A
Used £1,700

Overall rating

Next up: Ride & brakes
4 out of 5 (4/5)

Overlooked by many but those who’ve ridden them know how good they can be. The Kawasaki ZZR600 is an unlikely nutter bike but, on speed alone, it’s up there in the upper echelons of  the "bikes that can get you nicked in second gear" category.

Roomy and comfortable, the ZZR600 is practical, too, and you can pick them up for a song.

Ride quality & brakes

Next up: Engine
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The Kawasaki ZZR600 seat’s soft and plush but so, alas, is the suspension. Great brakes but the forks dive easily and the rear shock’s not brilliant either. It’s not dreadful but you notice it if you’re pushing hard. Otherwise, the Kawasaki ZZR600 is smooth and stable, even at high speeds. The gears can get clunky if you don’t tighten the chain very regularly.

Engine

Next up: Reliability
4 out of 5 (4/5)

A surprise, to say the least. The Kawasaki ZZR600 looks so docile by today’s standards yet twist the throttle and a ridiculous surge of power carries you up to the 14,000rpm redline in no time. The Kawasaki ZZR600 engine is reliable, grunty enough low down and positively mental at anything above about 4000rpm. Bloody hilarious!

Reliability & build quality

Next up: Value
4 out of 5 (4/5)

Cush drive wear, corrosion of downpipes and sagginess of old suspension are the most common complaints from Kawasaki ZZR600 owners but, overall, the bike’s a tough one. The engine’s excellent and it’s common to see Kawasaki ZZR600s knock up some vast mileages. Generally, build quality is good but many ZZR600s get ridden throughout winter so older models can look a bit scruffy.

Our extensive suite of Kawasaki ZZR600 owners' reviews show a few issues with batteries draining due to faulty regulators, and some problems with brakes and exhausts if bikes are left outdoors. 

Value vs rivals

Next up: Equipment
4 out of 5 (4/5)

Suffering from a slight image problem (riders overlook them in favour of more track-orientated machinery), you can pick up both new and used Kawasaki ZZR600s for some excellent prices, if you shop around (and haggle: list price is slightly steep). Insurance on a Kawasaki ZZR600 isn’t bad and the fuel consumption’s a plus: take it (relatively) easy and you’ll see over 200 miles out of a tank.

Equipment

4 out of 5 (4/5)

The Kawasaki ZZR600's vast fairing houses a good dash with analogue revs and speedo, digital clock, plus temperature and fuel gauges. There’s a little, lockable glove box too. The Kawasaki ZZR600's screen works well and useful bungee hooks make for easy touring. There’s a centrestand but be careful: it grounds out easily, especially two up.

Specs

Engine size 599cc
Engine type 16v inline four, 6 gears
Frame type Aluminium twin spar
Fuel capacity 18 litres
Seat height 780mm
Bike weight 182kg
Front suspension 46mm Cartridge fully adjustable
Rear suspension Preload and rebound
Front brake Twin 300mm discs
Rear brake 200mm disc
Front tyre size 120/60 x 17
Rear tyre size 160/60 x 17

Mpg, costs & insurance

Average fuel consumption 45 mpg
Annual road tax £84
Annual service cost £160
New price -
Used price £1,700
Insurance group 13 of 17
How much to insure?
Warranty term Two year unlimited mileage

Top speed & performance

Max power 99 bhp
Max torque 47 ft-lb
Top speed 154 mph
1/4 mile acceleration 11.3 secs
Tank range 178 miles

Model history & versions

Model history

  • 1990: Kawasaki ZZR600 first launched and marketed in the "supersports" category (which was very apt at the time).
  • 1993: Kawasaki ZZR600 got a major overhaul. New chassis and fairing, some engine modifications, a redesigned dash and new silencers.
  • 1995: Kawasaki ZZR600's suspension was uprated with rebound and preload adjustment.
  • 1996: Kawasaki ZZR600 got a digital clock.
  • 1998: An alarm and immobiliser were fitted to the Kawasaki ZZR600 as standard. No changes since.

Other versions

None

Owners' reviews for the KAWASAKI ZZR600 (1990 - 2007)

52 owners have reviewed their KAWASAKI ZZR600 (1990 - 2007) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your KAWASAKI ZZR600 (1990 - 2007)

Summary of owners' reviews

Overall rating: 4.6 out of 5 (4.6/5)
Ride quality & brakes: 4.3 out of 5 (4.3/5)
Engine: 4.8 out of 5 (4.8/5)
Reliability & build quality: 4.6 out of 5 (4.6/5)
Value vs rivals: 4.5 out of 5 (4.5/5)
Equipment: 4.3 out of 5 (4.3/5)
Annual servicing cost: £160
5 out of 5 ZZR600 - Fast and agile with nostalgia
01 July 2024 by ZZR Rider88

Year: 2007

Great motorcycle in the 600 cc class. A real riding experience with some nostalgia. My 2007 ZZR600 doesn't have a gas gauge, or a gear indicator but I don't need them. A real classic in the making.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5

The 2007 Kawasaki ZZR600 I own does have a gas gauge or a gear indicator but I knew that going in and don't mind. Make sure to only use premium fuel 91 or 93 octane and it runs extremely fast.

5 out of 5 2nd time around.
19 June 2023 by Phil

Year: 2000

On my 2nd zzr600 as I had one in the 90's. Good, fast comfortable bike that manages to be very economical and civilised at 'regular' speeds but can soon become a thirsty monster if you're feeling playful. It's not an agile, flickable bike so is hard work when scratching with mates on modern bikes but what it is, is fast. Still as fast as many modern 600's and very stable at high speed. But you can spend a lot of money on maintaining what is essentially a low value bike, for example, just done brake discs and tyres on mine cost me nearly £600 for what is a £1500 bike on a good day!

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

The standard brakes are adequate as long as in perfect condition. Mine are upgraded to better calipers, sintered pads and braided lines which have made a significant improvement. With a better suspension unit (yss) I can ride 300 miles a day without issues.

Engine 5 out of 5

The main reason zzr600's are so good. 30 year old engine design still gives lovely drive from low to strong midrange before it goes bonkers from 10,000 rpm. Feels like nitrous has activated at that point! I love it and that's why I bought a 2nd one.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Very reliable, these things are so simple and robust. Been flogging mine for 4 years now, no issues. And I do mean flogging!

Value vs rivals 2 out of 5

2 stars because it may be an old and low value bike but consumables such as brakes, tyres, chain/sprockets etc still cost as much for any bike.

Equipment 5 out of 5

For a bike of its era, it has nice practical things that have long since been forgotten or are on options list, ie, mainstand, bungee hooks, helmet lock, underseat storage and a small lockable compartment in the fairing. But to get the best out of it, it needs the brake and suspension upgrade and a decent pair of tyres. Metzler roadtec01 are brilliant for it.

Buying experience: Bought privately 4 years ago with 9k miles on the clock for £1500. You can get cheaper ones but probably not as nice as mine was.

5 out of 5
27 September 2022 by Phil1955

Version: E10

Year: 2002

Love this bike, bought an E1 new in 93 and had it for 20 years of trouble free riding. I swapped it for a three year old Yamaha FZ6 fazer but although they had the same BHP the Yamaha always seemed to be more sluggish and I never took to it. I've ended up swapping back and found a low mileage E10 and have been restoring some of the aged pieces on the bike.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Comfortable low seat and slightly raised bars make this bike a great mile muncher, I've done over three hundred miles in a day two up and got back without a sore backside and aching wrists which I couldn't do when I tried a CBR 600 for a day. Never had issues with the centre stand when two up but depending on the weight onboard I could imagine there maybe an issue if the two are on the chunky side.

Engine 5 out of 5

Absolutely superb, twist the throttle and watch the world flyby quite quickly and never fails to put a smile on your face.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Items to watch are, cush drives can soften up especially if you use the acceleration of that engine, front brake pistons can stick but are easy to clean and free off, change the rear shock and fit a hugger. Pre 2000 models have steel exhausts that rust so look for 2001 models on that were fitted with a stainless system.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Easy to service yourself if you use a Haynes manual for the likes of plugs, oil and filters, I used a motorcycle repair shop for valve adjustments which can run into a couple of hundred pounds because of the work involved in removing and replacing the body panels. Nice touch is that the swing arm has three grease nipples fitted for easy application of grease.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Early bikes came with two trip meters but a couple of models later this was changed and a digital clock replaced one of the trips. Nice little lockable storage box to the left hand side of the tank, someone has fitted a 12v socket to the inside of mine which is very handy.

Buying experience: Found mine privately, not many owners and all the bills and paperwork were included. Payed around 1K less than dealers were wanting.

4 out of 5 Still a relevant choice
15 November 2021 by Robert Oxford

Version: E

Year: 1996

Fast and comfortable bike but softer suspension. Would certainly recommend if cash is tight.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

This bike can be ridden all day and is a good tourer.

Engine 4 out of 5

The engine loves to be worked hard with fun starting around 7,000 rpm

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Downpipes rusted through and replaced by 4 into 1 Micron stainless system. Brakes had expensive repairs but no other trouble. The new exhaust system ended a perceived flat-spot. Electric chain oiler system came and went being more trouble than it was worth.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Servicing anything is expensive these days. My last one topped £300.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Nice to have a fuel gauge. Lighting performance now somewhat dated and mine bought just before they added a digital clock. I have added a double-bubble screen which was well-worth doing and a rear wheel hugger to keep things clean. I'm not really qualified to discuss tyre choice and have always tried to replace like with like.

Buying experience: I think I paid £6,000 when the dealer knocked £500 off for cash.

5 out of 5 Riding Down Under!
23 October 2021 by Rob

Year: 2005

Annual servicing cost: £250

This is a bike whose design has lasted for decades and was the backbone for the next generation of machines. You don't get that longevity if it's not a quality bike.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

A great balance of sports and comfort. Yes, the suspension is a little soft for a sports ride but not terribly so. You can still enjoy some corners and chicanes without losing it.

Engine 5 out of 5

Ah, the heart of the beast! You can be quite economical under 4000 rpm or warp speed above it. It's just a beautifully built engine.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Excellent quality build for the time. Sure we've moved to lighter alloys and plastics these days but, back when it was built, this was a brilliant balance between sports and durability.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

That's Aussie dollars for a service. Very little goes wrong so the costs are quite low. Parts are still readily available for routine services and maintenance.

Equipment 5 out of 5

I love the full fairings load. Smooth lines. I run on Pirelli tires but have been on Michelins too.

Buying experience: Bought from a dealer on sale consignment. $6,000 AUD back in 2009. In our current market it would still fetch $3,500 to $4,000 to the right buyer.

5 out of 5 The pocket rocket time machine
20 September 2020 by Chris F

Version: D

Year: 1992

These things are cheap as chips, yet happily blast away from many more "respectable" bikes. This is my second zzr, my first was an e-series. For what they are, they are fantastic. The issues they have are minor, rear suspension can be a problem. Strangely this D series has great rear suspension whereas the e, always bottomed out two up. Similarly the D has much better rear brake, why I don't know. I found the e rear brake fairly poor, much like the Honda deauville I owned. Another point for the D is the size of the fuel tank compared to the e, it has to be nearly twice the capacity, I do miss the fuel gauge though, the flashing lights seem to come on whenever they feel like it, so I can't rely on it. My bikes are used 24/7 and the finish, particularly calipers and wheels suffer from the great outdoors, however I found the plastics good in weathering. I have owned Suzuki and Honda 600/650's and K's zzr win over them by a country mile. I love 'em.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

What you would expect from a sports tourer, softish, but comfortable,yes, I am tall too (6'3") as mentioned above the rear suspension can be a problem. I found the front brakes excellent, the rear better on the D than the E.

Engine 5 out of 5

The engine is a work of art. Absorbs anything you want from it. Screaming it's way to 16000 if you want it to, but happy toddling along at 30 in 6th. I did notice both D and E series did not like long periods at slow speeds/ revs in the summer, with a tendency to overheat, however quite alot of bikes have that same issue. The answer to that is a good zap and the gauge soon becomes sensible again. The power delivery is smooth and seemless, initially appearing "slowish" until you breach 5/6000 rpm when it leaps out of its mechanical trousers turning a dignified howl into a Banshee scream as it hurls itself frantically down the road. As God is my judge. I love it... its amazing...

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

As mentioned above,if kept outdoors and used 24/7 then calipers and wheels suffer, which is to be expected I suppose. The rest of the finish seemed to hold up well. On both e and D series I ran through cam chains quite quickly, they got rowdy. Had to replace on both bikes. The e was very finicky with air leaks and wouldn't go over 40mph when a minor airleak occurred. Took me a month of messing to discover the problem. For some reason the D doesn't have this issue. Both series had minor electronic issues now and then, stator went on the D, along with the occasional fuse and bulbs, with the e going through three batteries in five years. All said and done not expensive issues.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

I do my own servicing, so the costs are very low, both D and E series demand regular oil changes or the gear change gets clunky. They absolutely eat fuel if given the beans regularly. Which I certainly used to. However if driven like a person of my age should drive (67) I got an extra 60 miles on a tankful!(D) Insurance and tax are cheap when you consider what this machine can do Replacement parts are very reasonable, however engine gasket sets cost a bomb, mostly over £100! I managed eventually to get a set at nearly £80. Both series have an IC igniter made by mitsubishi. These are like gold dust secondhand (if you can find one!) New over £400! So some bits cost alot.

Equipment 5 out of 5

Tyres I notice are very much a personal matter . I like the pilot's, good rubber slightly on the softish side. I found others a bit on the hard side. I will say the bikes handling is very noticeable and changeable depending on your tyre choice. My first zzr had full nonfango hard luggage which was brilliant, alas no longer available. But you could carry an amazing load with the three 55L boxes. (I think it was 55L)

Buying experience: I bought privately, and because the bikes were in good condition didn't get any reduction worth mentioning. But the cost of zzrs is compensation enough when you consider now much bike you are getting for your money. They are fantastic value for money. The

5 out of 5 Dunlop
18 June 2020 by mwzx10r

Year: 1994

The Ram Air made all the difference!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

The only issue I had was riding at high speed in Germany in the winter...Ram Air caused the bike to run sluggish until it thawed

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 ZZR600
24 April 2020 by Garf Drums

Year: 1998

Annual servicing cost: £200

Not as good as my old zzr1100 but still a very nice comfy bike.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Very comfortable and everything works as it should

Engine 5 out of 5

Quite quick

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Just a duff battery so far

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Relatively cheap tax and insurance, food economy.

Equipment 5 out of 5

It has all you need but gear indicator might be nice

Buying experience: Private, initially advertised at £1200. Bought for £900. Bargain

4 out of 5 I've had bikes since I was sixteen but this is the first that was a danger to my licence.
17 April 2020 by Alan Summerfield

Year: 1991

It was affordable, does everything I want or need it to do

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5

Docile up to 6000 rpm goes like a bat out of hell from 8000 rpm

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Shortly after I bought it the battery kept going flat during a ride. This turnred out to be a defective regulator

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Serviced at home oils, filters brake fluid, occasional new spark plugs, one set of brake disks in 10 years

Equipment 4 out of 5

it is capable of going faster and leaning further than I am prepared to push it

Buying experience: it was a private sale 10 years old and £2000 He had just bought a ne Aprilla and his wife would not let him keep both

4 out of 5 Cracker of a bike
24 November 2019 by Steve b

Year: 1993

Cracking motor very very quick 600 up to 154 mph

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Have stock front brakes on mine do job you can bolt set CBR 900 98-2000 calipers on to upgrade

Engine 5 out of 5

Goes like stink Watch out for 2nd gear if it jumps out 2nd under load walk away

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5

Fuel guage 2 trip clocks Basic but works

Buying experience: Bought from a shop

4 out of 5
20 April 2019 by Chalk

Version: E11P

Year: 2003

Once the Engine was "altered" Increase in power,better fuel economy, not so snatchy in gear changes.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

Brakes are (To me) excellent with just the right amount of feel. Suspension is the only weak spot.

Engine 4 out of 5

Love it.. A great mix of mid-range and top end, don't have to tap dance as much as others to move.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Suspension is for light weight riders. Definitely needs a upgrade (Too soft even when full hard dial up)

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Time consuming having to take the all fairings off to do any maintenance. Allow 2 hours to change Air filter.

Equipment 5 out of 5

The lay-out is perfect for me. No finicky electronics telling me what I can/can't do. control is by feel, not some box putting "0's" and "1's" and telling me what I need.

4 out of 5 First Kawasaki not my last
17 March 2019 by Paul

Version: D model

Year: 1991

Bought this as a very cheap winter hack, which had been seriously neglected, whilst my Blade sat comfortably in the garage. But circumstances forced me to sell the blade and I found myself focussing on improving and sprucing up the ZZR. I replaced all the bearings, put an aftermarket (cheapest, YSS) shock on, raised it by 35mm (bike farm jack up bones) put some progressive fork springs in (Wirth), did the Nissin (FireBlade) front caliper upgrade, changed the front pegs for adjustable ones that can be raised and rear set slightly, shimmed the carbs (as there was a huge flat spot off idle because of the aftermarket downpipes) and just generally gave it a whole heap of much needed TLC. Needless to say it’s like a new (old) bike now. I honestly wasn’t going to keep it and I thought it was beyond help, but low and behold underneath the last 27 years of neglect there was a solid machine that just needed help. Due to my handling upgrades, it is (I believe) better than when it was new, turns in fine, doesn’t ground out easily as it’s got considerably more ground clearance, and stops amazingly. All that without compromising very much at all on comfort. Engines on these are fine even now for power unless your a bit daft and want to go to jail. I love it perfectly adequate for fast road riding and I might even consider doing a track day or two on it. Commuting and long distance it is comfortable too.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

I found the original Tokiko front calipers problematic, but this was probably due to lack of maintenance. I decided to upgrade to 98-2002 FireBlade callipers and put braided lines on too which combined with the already great rear brake has made the brakes tremendous. Ride quality as standard is far too soft for me but it’s pretty stable.

Engine 5 out of 5

Nothing needed doing to the engine totally brilliant. Power delivery is quite linear and manageable, it's plenty fast enough for the road.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

I’d say tremendous. This bike should’ve been ready for the scrap yard in the near future due to neglect but underneath was still strong.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Value is great considering how much you can pick one up for, can drink fuel if pushed though, insurance cheap. If you spend a few hundred quid on some suspension, brakes etc you’d struggle to find a better bike for the same total cost, Parts are generally very cheap.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Pretty good but my D model doesn’t have a fuel gauge or clock. I put one of those phone charger/holders on the handlebars. Tyres-wise I opted for Bridgestone Battleaxe BT016 which have been around a while but are sticky enough for having fun and last as well. I paid £125 for a pair off eBay.

Buying experience: Privately, £400 for a relatively low mileage (28k) very neglected model. Unless you want to be tinkering with everything I’d advise spending at least double that then a few hundred on brakes & suspension £12-1300 gets you a ton of bike.

5 out of 5 Always a thrill....
25 September 2018 by Big balls

Version: E13H

Year: 2005

Annual servicing cost: £100

Bikes been Superb! Reliability is excellent and very comfortable on long journeys and the power is amazing when needed! A pleasure to own.....

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5

Stops absolutely fine but then again I never ride it to its full potential....lol

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Holding up very well considering all the types of weather thrown at it when on tour! Quality is excellent!

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Just the usual tweets etc.

Equipment 5 out of 5

Has everything you need!

4 out of 5 Burgundy blaster
20 October 2016 by Kawasaki Ken

Year: 1998

Passed test in Nov '13 a week before my 69th birthday. Thank the Lord I went for a 250cc twin to start with and not the ZZR600, or I would surely not be here now to do this review ! As a new biker I am not qualified to comment too much, except to say that it knocks spots off the Suzuki GSX600F which was the same age.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5

Very lively at higher revs, but I also find it ok for commuting without screaming!!

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Bought early September (5 weeks ago) with only 6500 miles on clock and in immaculate condition, runs like a dream.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Don't know yet

Equipment 5 out of 5

Cockpit layout is good, with clock, temp gauge and fuel gauge. Lockable small storage box on left fairing, which may come in handy some day! Bungee clips on pillion sides.

Buying experience: Bought privately for good price considering age, condition and low mileage!!!

4 out of 5 every day life on two wheels
25 September 2016 by Wemmick

Year: 1999

I've had the zzr600 for a year and bought her as an easy return to riding after a three year break to use around town and on motorways. It's hard to explain why because this bike does nothing any newer 600 won't do but I absolutely love the zzr600. It's plenty fast enough for me, handles solidly and is reliable and the willingness of the old girl is grin inducing with acceleration like a fast bmw maybe rather than a ferrari but that's fine with me. As a bonus although I like the looks of her thieves don't and I leave her parked in the street without stressing. A great every day real world motorcycle

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Super Sport in Sheeps Clothing
04 July 2016 by Robin Gray

Year: 2007

Annual servicing cost: £100

The only bad feature is the lack of a gas gauge. All the rest is positive. This bike handles better than my former bike, a Yamaha R6. First gear is perfect for the street, Midrange power is outstanding, Not to mention that beautiful sound it makes. This is my first Kawi I have owned and wont be the last. I've owned Honda and Yamaha with a short experience with Suzuki. The Kawi rules all. Did I mention the super comfortable seat? I will likely investigate a ZX10R in my future.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Comfort plus and yet still a great track bike. Brakes are amazing!

Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Excellent on fuel consumption, even when you are hard on the throttle.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Needs a gas guage

4 out of 5 Excellent highway cruiser with great engine
31 May 2016 by Oncle Stefan

Version: Probably 2002 build

Year: 2004

Bought this bike for 2 reasons: first & foremost found a £650 bargain one of late production years, second it was supposed to be a good beginner bike. Clearly a beginner mile-eater, excellent engine with tons of character, sporty but very comfy on highway. For beginning the riding position is too sporty and it's also too heavy.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

Lower on Ride quality for me as a beginner, and I might have made the mistake to keep the Battleax front tire too long (3 years when I bought the bike). Not a reliable tire in the wet when not new! The front limit is a little difficult to feel, but that's probably for a good part due to my lack of experience. Brakes are good, rather racer-sharpish. Addictive top-end rush of the engine is nice to experience on every straight bit, as said excellent on the highway & probably very good in experienced hands.

Engine 5 out of 5

The big + of this bike. Great character, great pull above 6.000, great sound, good fuel consumption.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

For me 4+, I would dare to compare it to BMW on fit & finish of chassis & bodywork. The Bavarians still have to design & build a 600cc with 100 HP that lasts as long. The previous owner did nothing except little bit of oil change, drove in all weather including winter & salt, yet the machine was far from wrecked once cleaned, serviced & polished.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Servicing is normal, resale value is low, but fuel consumption is good & there are plenty of spares at good price, so give it my thumbs up.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Clock, precise fuel gauge, very good mirrors. Excellent seat, just the sitting position which is sporty compact & leaned forward, so not so great at lower speeds. Good wind & weather protection.

Buying experience: Bought privately from 3d owner @ 33 000 km, sold @ 35 000 to buy a real beginner's bike, Honda Hornet.

4 out of 5 Brilliant do anything bike with loads of character
28 February 2016 by PDBD

Version: E11

Year: 2002

Fantastic all-rounder. Is everything you need, is great fun to ride and would definitely recommend it to a friend. Would have kept it longer than the 7 years I had it if it wasn't involved in a prang and became a CAT D write-off.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

The seat is very comfortable. Faring with double bubble after-market screen provided excellent wind protection. I installed handlebar risers for a slightly more upright seating position for touring. Updated rear shock to Hagon which improved the handling, although to be fair the cornering was never fantastic! Front brakes were okay but never felt great. Installed Nissan calipers and braided hoses to the front which helped.

Engine 5 out of 5

Bulletproof motor never missed a beat. Fantastic acceleration after £7k rpm and huge grin inspiring howl from the ram air intakes, and yet a doddle to handle on the daily commute. Can sit at motorway speeds all day.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Had the bike for 7 years and the only breakdown I had was a flat battery when the stator packed up. I also replaced the exhaust with a stainless steel one shortly after purchasing the bike due to corrosion. Had to replace the front discs which had warped at 19k but to be fair that may be more due to poor care and maintenance through a bad winter. The bike generally needed plenty of TLC through the winter and I replaced most nuts and screws with stainless steel ones.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Bike is simple enough for a novice to do basic maintenance and servicing. I spent quite a bit on the bike but these costs were generally on improvements rather than maintenance - only because it was such a pleasure to ride!

Equipment 4 out of 5

Good (old fashioned) analogue clocks, fuel gauge, trip meter and clock. Everything you need. Need storage box in fairing and the bungee hooks were fantastic for touring

Buying experience: Bought privately for £2k in 2008 - has kept its value so you can't loose. MCN described this bike as a future classic so go and get one

5 out of 5 Great quick all rounder
17 October 2015 by jsmithy

Version: E7

Year: 2001

Being 6' 6” tall my choice of fully-faired sub-750cc bikes is limited but a few work such as the RF600 (to some extent), the VFR750 and now my ZZR. It is a very comfortable bike to ride and my knees don't bash the fairing. It also makes a surprisingly composed city bike. The party starts at 8000rpm when the engine goes into a sort of a mental mode powering you to silly speeds (I was doing 69mph officer, honest). The delivery is quite linear but incredibly powerful and stable. This thing was built to go fast and it does it well. Yes, yes modern 600s will whoop it's arse but who needs more than 100 horses on British roads really? To those people who claim a 200 mile tank range – how? Mine barely does 130 to a tank. Having said that mine s a bit lumpy below 4000rpm which indicates it needs a bit of tweaking but even so I can't see how a 200 mile tank range is achievable on this bike without riding it like my Grandad (RIP) used to drive his Austin Maestro. To summarise, I love it.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

The brakes perform well and it is very comfy. I've given it a 4 only because there is always room for improvement.

Engine 4 out of 5

The power delivery is very satisfying. The gearbox is a bit of a clunker though.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Compare it to a Honda and you'll notice the difference in build quality but in isolation it is a very solid and well put together machine. I replaced the exhaust myself recently and did come across some seized screws on the fairing mounts so take care with it. No reliability issues as yet.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

It is a conventional machine so I expect typical service costs for a sports 600.

Equipment 5 out of 5

Clock, bungee hooks and good storage. The fuel gauge is nice but useless. It's either full to the brim or empty and not a lot goes on in between. Best to reset the trip meter when you fill up.

Buying experience: I bought mine from a dealer and no problems to report other than a speedo drive fault which was fixed under warranty.

4 out of 5 ZZR 600 1991, still a great sport tourer!
03 October 2015 by Michele

Version: ZZR 600 D

Year: 1991

Best bike for the best price. Comfortable, practical, and with good performances, on par with current basic 600 cc bikes like CBF and XJ6. You can pick them for €1000 and you get a great 4-cylinder commuter with sporty ambitions, albeit outdated, to travel or have some fun. Like VFR, but MUCH cheaper.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Extremely stable at high speed. Not a lightweight but not too heavy, despite the age (low gravity centre). Pleasant on tight corners too, but you have to be smooth - soft fork is a problem when braking. Suspensions are extremely soft- don't ride in grand-prix style or the bike stability will suffer. Brakes are good but they have the tendency to have stuck pistons in the winter. Upgrades on fork, shock and brakes will improve the "aggressive" ride for sure.

Engine 4 out of 5

Still surprisingly powerful for a 1990 engine. Starts promptly and runs smooth after few seconds. Extremely smooth and sweet from 1500 to 8000, but also very weak. You have sometime to downshift twice. From 8000 it suddenly kicks in and starts to be very powerful and fast. Gearshift is bad, the worst part of the bike. 1st and 2nd are clunky, they need to be treated well (don't rev too much during change, always properly lubed chain), or you will end in a faulty gearbox. Treat it well and it will last forever. Other gears are hard to operate with city traffic, decent on open roads but you need some throttle skills to make them smoother.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Build quality is surprising. Paint is still perfect and shining, fairing plastic is still flexible. Some screws and bolts are a bit rough and have a white oxydized patina, but no rust. The grey paint on rims and frame looks more fragile though. Dashboard plastic (glove box lid etc) turns to grey with the age, i have repainted them in matte black. But hey, it's 24 years old. In some cases the bike is finished better than some new bikes!

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Being a 24-years old bike, it requests some operations now and then. The only major problem was the alternator (€100). Everything else is normal maintenance (oil, carbs, spark plugs, some electrical details etc). Don't mistreat the gearbox between 1st and 2nd gear.

Equipment 3 out of 5

Comfortable windscreen and fairings, glove box, and retractable hooks on the sides, center stand. Still practical and comfortable today for long travels. It lacks a fuel indicator (just two flashing lights) and seat key lock, mounted since 1993. The seat on my version is fixed with two bolts. Not a big problem - bring an Allen key with you (keep it in the glove box) and the seat is off in 30 seconds.

Buying experience: Bought from a private.

5 out of 5 A Wolf in Sheeps Clothing
11 September 2015 by Imcrazyquick

Version: ZZR600 / ZX6E

Year: 2004

Purchased new in 2004 and runs like new @ 40K miles. This is a fast bike that doesn't compromise on comfort. It won't wear you out on long rides. It has great wind protection and it is stable at high speeds or on wet roads. I love the cockpit layout. The center stand comes in handy for regular maintenance. Bulletproof engine, smooth gearbox, and commuter friendly. I've owned and ridden many motorcycles and the 2004 Kawasaki ZZR600 has to be one of my all time favorites. . .

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

It could use a better back brake. It isn't horrible but I've seen better.

Engine 5 out of 5

For a 600cc engine the ZZR has loads of power. It is quick off the line and very responsive at high speeds. Many guys I ride with comment on how quick it is and I usually get much better fuel economy than them averaging 50 - 55 MPG.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Never an issue or problem with anything.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Only money spent has been for regular maintenance, gas, oil changes, and tires.

Equipment 5 out of 5

Love the analogue gauges and I use the retractable luggage clips all the time. The centre stand is also handy for chain adjustments and regular maintenance.

Buying experience: I bought the bike new in 2004 and the price out the door was a bit over $7500.

5 out of 5
14 May 2015 by James

Year: 1998

Top marks!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5

Buying experience: I brought the zzr in 2000, from a dealer for £3700 and I have never regretted buying it and it still working perfectly 15 years later.

5 out of 5 Perfect
05 November 2013 by

Bought my ZZR in June this year, a E7 model with 15137 miles on the clock now has 26594. Really really like this bike. A great engine that goes like the proverbial at 8K revs. All day comfort, 842 miles was the longest I rode in one day, only reason I stopped was we were at our destination. Wife finds the pillion seat very comfortable. The brakes have been upgraded with braided lines and Carbon Lorraine pads, may upgrade to Nissin callipers next year, a double bubble screen, rear hugger, fender extenda Tutoro automatic oiler, 12V power socket and stainless down pipes are the only other mods. The rear shock is now goosed, Hagon replacement rear shock on order £300 other than that everything good. Things I like All day comfort Mental engine Centre stand Weather protection The looks Twin silencers, give it a nice symmetrical look Bungee hooks everywhere A decent pillion seat Comprehensive dash Fuel economy, 200 miles to a tank Cruises at 80+ 2 up all day long Overall handling Cost to buy Insurance costs, mind you I'm over 40 Things I don't like The front end is a tad soft when pushed The rear shock isn't the best The brakes need to be carefully maintained and upgraded Very dependent on good chain tensioning for smooth gear changes The servicing schedule could be a bit more in keeping with the sports tourer niche it has occupied since the ZX6R was launched, would gladly sacrifice some top end power for this. To sum up a fast and thus far very reliable sport tourer that has all day comfort with very economical running costs. As good 2 up as it is solo, with a completely bonkers engine, when you want it to be. Love the bike so much I am going to strip her down and completely restore her over the winter, never done this with a disposable Japanese bike before.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 Under rated 600
08 June 2013 by Edmund1990

Great bike, restricted will easily cruise at 80, max around 110, easily enough for a new rider, main difference is how quickly you get there. Unrestricted performs as well as any modern 600, the competition is more about your skill as a rider. Handles and grips the road well, had no trouble here. Can pick one up for a great price. Starts every time, no trouble in coldest days in winter, just needs a bit of choke and check the tires aren't too cold and slippery. Bike is very fun when you get up into the power band, around 7k - 13k rpm, which i find the bike needs now and again to keep her running smooth, and it sounds and feels great too. Dash clock is a neat feature, as well as the disc lock compartment. Great for commuting as very comfortable, can also imagine being great for a long trip or tour. But don't let this fool you into thinking it's a standard touring bike, the class sports-tourer fits it perfectly. Good first bike, although I would always suggest starting on something less mental in the power band first.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 Great motorcycle
07 June 2013 by

I have had my zzr600 95 model now for about three months and i like it a lot it. I have driven it about 4000km so far. No mechanical problems so far, I have just lubed the chain and brake/clutch leavers and filled the tank. What i like: I find the ergonomics of the bike really good. The knee angle is good. And all levers and buttons are well placed. Its low and not too wide so it is easy to place both feet on the ground (I am 182cm tall, think i could still do easily it if i were 160cm) The suspension is soft enough to be comfy on normal road with potholes and the like, but not so soft it becomes an issue when driving fast. The engine is totally smooth in its power delivery and above 7-8000rpm it goes mental. Its cheap, both to buy, insure and run. It does not use much fuel. I get about 5l/100km. What i do not like: The front brakes. Its a kind of spongy feel to the brake lever, even though the bakes are in top condition and are properly bleed. They do work just fine, and will stop the bike with my brain wanting to escape trough my eye sockets. But to do this re lever require a bit to much force for my liking, and the lack that crisp feeling. All in all I really love my ZZR and I plan to keep her for a while.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 zzr600 1993
03 October 2012 by brownylad1312

ive owned my zzr now for 2 months and i have to say a great bike. i had a gsxr 400 before this and i have to say i enjoy the kwak more. bin round scotland on it, kept up with the supersports no problem on it and it never missed a beat. would make a great first bike.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 brilliant even restricted
07 July 2012 by johnlad1

ive just got a 1990 zzr 600 with a 33bhp restricter and ive got to say as my first big bike i can fault it even restricted the engine has enough poke to easily get you grinning from ear to ear, the breaks all tho they may be found lacking by more expereinced riders are plenty for a novice. its a bit on the heavy side but because its so low down this isnt realy an issue most people will be able to get there feet flat on the floor and one its moving you wont realy notice. well worth a look can pick them up in ok condition for around a grand.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
5 out of 5 Superb machine
26 June 2012 by

As some idiot trashed my beloved FZ6 Fazer I needed a new bike. I got an '06 ZZR600 E6F. Wow! Just Wow! Handles like a dream, has superb balance and the engine is magnificent. On 100 mile motorway trip it was *cruising* at speeds the Fazer was racing at. Round the lanes it stuck to the road like glue. The low end is smooth enough to commute, the top end grunty enough to fly and the mid-range is just everything in between ;). I was looking at one of these or a Thundercat and I am so glad I went with my instinct and got this. Apart from my mate's ZZR1100 this tops every bike I've ridden and as I'm doing a lot of shorter range riding on this it suits me much more than the 1100. Amazing bike, love it.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Great Bike!!!
10 June 2012 by Skinbeatersam

This is my second bike, and ever since knowing about these, I coveted one. So pleased with my 2002 ZZR600!! It really does have a mental engine, although I find you have to rev it past 5-6k for it's manic side to come out. It is comfortable and at 6ft2in I was surprised that I don't feel at all cramped on the comfortable seat. Faring gives good protection from the elements. The bike is also well equipped with a fuel gauge, center stand, little glove compartment as well as alright underseat storage. There are also things that show that Kawasaki have the rider in mind, such as the little windows in the bike that let you check rear brake fluid and coolant without having to take the seat off or remove the fuel tank, making maintenance easier. The double exhaust gives you good road presence too ensuring that dozy drivers will at least 'feel' you if they don't bother to try to see you. Great engine noise too!! It has plenty of poke too, although it doesn't feel like it as it is very very smooth to ride, so you don't often realise how quick it is. No problem though cos the handling is confidence inspiring. Feels like a CBR600F!! Great bike!! Get one!!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 WOW!!! WHAT A BIKE
05 November 2011 by djduracell

Where do i start? passed DAS a few months ago, bought a 1993 zzr600, cant compare it to any other 600cc bikes due to being 1st big bike but for the money you get alot of bike, done a 500 mile tour to skye and what a great bike it was, handling and power was fantastic, after 500 miles i wasnt to sore with the ride position, i would defo buy another one..

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 What a little animal!
16 October 2011 by oba54

I bought my 04 ZZR 600 2 years ago. Having been away from biking for 10 years I wanted nothing bigger than a 600 (lack of confidence), but wow what a great bike. The first time a took it for a run on the motorway I expected an average preformance but to my surprise it preformed like a it was bulit for the race track. Smooth and powerful overtaking with ease and instilling a huge amount of confidence. I've had no mechanical issues despite riding it through 2 winters. Some say its a good first bike but I think even an experienced biker wouldn't get bored of this little gem.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 1998/1999 Cat C rebuild
03 July 2011 by Foxyrobin

Having owned a Kawasaki GT550 1992 for many years, i decided to buy another bike which was more modern and watercooled.I tok my freind's ZZr600 ( m reg) for an Mot and found it quite comfortable to ride( im 5ft7). So i looked into buying a ZZr600. Orginally i bought a 1998 Cat C ZZr600 off Ebay. The bike had very little damage to it only needing the clutch cable and silencer replacing to pass an mot. BUT i found owning a CAT C was a problem to insure. You cant uses any online qoutes, some places wont insure them and others will charge at least double the premium and there is no guarentee youll get paid in the event of a claim....Anyway so i decided to buy another one and use the CAT C for parts.The CAT C cost me £700,1999 Frame and logbook cost me £220 and then my time dismantling and rebuilding. The diffrence in insurance cost was halfed.. my premium is £74 3rd party F+T... cheaper than the GT550 i had!!. Another thing i did was to replace the front calipers with RVF400/CBR900 ones, which dramatically improoved the dodgy braking i had. Now i can lock the front wheel if i apply too hard!. Ive recently done a 274 mile trip and the bike ran fine. Handling is a bit naff, part due to suspension, but mainly the tyres Soft bridgestone on the rear(previous owner), which when powering out of the apex slides and Mitchellin Madcam?? on the front which runs noisey when cold an handles like your on black ice in the wet(sh#t tyre- but mot/road legal). I will save up and replace the tyres, most lightly Pirelli's

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 1999 zzr 6
21 June 2011 by grav84

this was the bike i use to wish i had when i was at school and i got it last year after doing my das i went to switzerland and the south of france and it never missed a beat and even now the way it goes takes my breath away. my dad rides a bandit 1250 and he says the zzr's got some serious poke

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 Excellent first bike
23 June 2010 by kibblerdon

Went from an FT500 thumper to a 1990 ZZR600 within a few months of getting my big bike licence. What a difference. I have owned the ZZR for over a year now and it has been so reliable, even through the winter. Strengths: Engine, power, comfort, reliability, very forgiving, easy to work on yourself. Weaknesses: Soft suspension, mushy brakes (braided hoses help alot) I would recommend a ZZR to anyone as it will do anything, commuting, touring, a bit of scratching or a blast, it has the grin factor and the engine is bullet proof.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 Purple & Pink ZZR600
08 May 2010 by bluemurder

I bought a 93[K]one 5 years ago when I got back into biking, just like the one in the pictures above. I've bought, sold & ridden loads of other bikes since but I've always kept the little ZZR. It's the best all round bike I've ever owned. It's good for touring & a Sunday spin and you can throw it around quite a bit within the handling's limits. It's really pretty quick, even today. It's comfy, although the low seat cramps your legs a bit if you're tall. SP1 / CBR600RR front calipers fit easily and work well, especially with braided hoses. They make the front end dive worse though, unless you fit progressive springs too. Hagon rear shocks work well and stop the bounce. A double bubble screen stops quite a bit of the turbulence. I haven't had any real problems although old ones can apparently jump out of second gear. Don't cost much to run and pretty reliable. Mines on 40k with no real problems. Even though they're quite an old model, they're so nice I'm actually thinking of buying newer one.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 Perfect
26 January 2010 by TruBlu

This bike suits ME perfectly.Ive ridden so many bikes over the years(ex bike salesman), and for where im at now,i cant fault the bike at all.My partner really likes this bike the best as a pillion passenger.I know there are newer bikes that have improved things a bit, but for me its brilliant.And for what i paid for it,you would have to steal one to get it cheaper!Mine is a minter,it was a case of right place, right time etc..A gift from Heaven!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 A "do anything" bike
28 October 2009 by Limpet7R

I bought my ZZR600 E2 after passing my test in 2002, have had several other bikes since, but I've hung on to it all this time. The reason is, it's worth naff all to sell, and frankly it's still a lovely bike to ride, and does everything I ask of it. Scratching, commuting, touring, bumbling around town - it does it all. The engine is a belter. Tractable and docile, and with beautifully set up carb'd fuelling, it will pull cleanly from car revs in any gear, but as it approaches 7000 RPM you feel it perk up, by 8000 RPM it's gone into full blown mental mode, and screams its way to 14,000 RPM (and beyond if you let it) in one addictive long surge. Sounds really angry as it does so as well - like it's about to burst out of the frame. The airbox howls away like on all Kwaks, and it still makes me grin even after all this time. Returns 50 mpg on a gentle commute too. Needs its plugs regularly gapping and cleaning, and the camchain tensioner greasing and resetting annually, but other than that, totally untemperamental, oil tight, and never skips a beat. When I got it, I quickly became annoyed at the centre stand decking, particularly two up. Although convenient for maintenance, I took the centre stand off, upgrading the hopeless rear shock to a Hagon at the same time. What a difference not only in terms of handling and ground clearance, but ride too. Changing the fork oil for a heavier weight helps the dive too. The biggest disappointment really is the quality of the parts used on the bike. The cheap mild steel collector box rots and disintegrates, brake caliper pistons seize, discs warp, and fasteners corrode if you even mention the word salt. When the original exhaust fell to bits, I fitted a 4-1 Micron system with a Quill T3 can, which sounds great, but took a stage 1 Dynojet kit and four hours of dyno time to set up. The fuelling on these bikes is very picky, and I would recommend talking to a tuner before you buy replacement pipes - I would have saved myself hundreds. On the plus side, the dyno session found 3 bhp, with a healthy 102 bhp on a then 18,000 mile engine. It's a comfy bike with a sporty but not extreme riding position, excellent mirrors, and a decent pillion seat. The low seat height makes it easy for shorter riders, but at 6ft 2, I'm not cramped either. You sit "in" this bike rather than perch on top of it. I've done 350 miles in a day, and apart from a slightly numb bum, had no aches and pains at all. The generous fairing makes motorway cruises effortless, but taller riders should invest in a double bubble screen for a more peaceful upper body experience. On the whole, it's a fantastic bike with a storming engine, license losing performance, and good reliability. With a suspension upgrade it handles well beyond most people's capabilities (mine included), yet will tour, commute and amble equally happily. Peanuts to buy as well, but watch for those exhausts and brakes, as you could quite easily end up spending £500+ to put them right. That's a lot on a bike you can pick up for £800 upwards. If it weren't for the poor quality of the original exhaust, brakes and shock, reckon the bike would deserve five stars.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 A good cheep bike
05 August 2008 by Mjollnir

Ok in it's hay day it was considered very fast indeed, but by modern standards it is now a sports tourer. For a first bike/ cheep bike you cannot fault it. That is not to say it is without it's faults. The suspension is a little soggy and the riding position doesn't quite suit me, but these are small things. Fuel economy is good, and I did enjoy riding it.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
5 out of 5 ZZR 600 E11
20 June 2008 by

Once I got the the bike from Whites in Swindon. I headed out to to get the suspension sorted. As eveyone, I think, would have grounded out the centre stand. Jacked up the rear and stiffened the front and she worked a treat.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 ZZR 600 E5
17 April 2008 by cbrpilot

This is the second ZZR 600 I've bought. After giving up trying to cut my arse in half on a CBR600RR, I stopped and thought about previous bikes and what I wanted out of riding. I considered a VFR800-2, but the cost put me off. Then I remembered how the ZZR 600 D2 I had got me in and out of Birmingham for work over 3 years, in comfort. It only ever stopped once, and that was a snapped drive chain (my fault...) and was light on fuel and tyres. The later version has a few more bits. Fuel gauge is nice, so is a clock. Sure a CBR is quicker, but I think Honda should come back to the real world again. I thought the CBR600F was superb, but since then they just rev to oblivion and are so bloody uncomfortable. I want to go 24 miles to work, and then I still need to be able to walk for christ'sake. The ZZR is doing europe this year, something I've wanted to do for years, and something I know it will do well, with no drama. All in all, it's a real world bike. It's useable.And no I'm not Valentino Rossi.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 love it
18 March 2008 by gazkwak

i have a 1993 zx6d american import which is the same as a zzr 600 i can,t believe the power for a 15 year old 600

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 No baby Koalas here
24 February 2008 by eatcs01

A truly excellent bike. Viewed by many as “an old man’s” bike, or even a bike for people who haven’t learned to ride properly yet. How wrong can they be. Sure, it’s not a ZX6, but for 90% of ROAD riding, it’s just as quick, and easier. I am on my 2nd E model. The fairing is big enough to keep the rain off me. The seat is “all day” comfy. The engine is a real gem. Lots of real world bottom end torque, but with a screaming, 14000rpm top end. A sports tourer that will do an indicated 160mph. Faster than a VFR. The handling is good enough to get the pegs down. A centre stand makes tyre changes & chain lubing an absolute doddle. Most of my riding is 2-up, so a “Sports” bike is out of the question. My partner doesn’t want to look like a baby Koala on the back (as seen on any sports bike, on a Sunday). 1500 miles in a week round France, and no real discomforts. The brakes are a weak point, and so is the finish. The brakes are an issue, because they’ve never been updated since 1993. Honda cbr600/900 rr2/3 front calipers fit (almost) straight on, and improve the braking LOADS. The finish is OK, but if ridden in the winter, it needs regular rinsing. The standars mild steel downpipes are scrap after 1 or 2 winters. There are plenty of stainless systems about. Newer models have them as stock. I'm taking it drag racing this year. Watch this space for my quarter mile times...... (I anticipate 11.5 secs).

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 zzr600.
26 June 2007 by JustinHancock

Iv owned 2 zzr 600's now. the 1991 and the 1994 model. both of which i thoroughly enjoyed. The motor goes great with a perfect spread of power and great top end. Sounds beautiful too. (does it have gear driven cams cos it sounds like it- jet engine whine). The look and finish lasts very well and is an extremely reliable bike. picked both of mine up dirt cheap privately too. On the handling side they are of course more of a sports tourer but if u fit good tyres and are prepared to climb all over the bike to get it to handle at its best then really not too much can be complained against it. Though of course it is a bit soft and is its eventual undoing. Best bike ever for having a pillion on!

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Best Sports Tourer ever
21 June 2007 by dsaich

Had a D2 model from new many years ago had it about 4 years and clocked up 78000 miles and just 1 clutch replacement and the normal exhaust replacement for a stainless one then traded it in for a Urban Tiger Blade.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Year-round commuter bought for new at a knockdown price.
06 June 2006 by ivan_lima

Looking for a replacement for my 17 year old GPX600 I knew it had to be a middleweight and faired Kawasaki multi. Oh, and with a fairing as it commuted all through the year and would include occasional long trips. After looking at some ropey used ZZ-Rs for about 3 - 4 grand I found a shop selling a pre--registered H13 for just over four grand!! I nearly bit their arm off. The bike is just so efficient, especially after my clanky and worn-out old GPX. The engine is such a peach - the clinical proficiency you expect from a multi but with an atomic right hander when you're prepared to wind it on. It's also excellent around town, although a little more urge below 4,000 revs wouldn't go amiss. Finish is pretty good, although some of the fittings and exposed metal has suffered after only half a winter! Scottoil FS365 has helped to prevent it being even worse. One of the best things is its full stainless system (partly because it has a catalytic converter). Strengths: Engine - superb. Brakes - also superb, but need to be kept in tip top shape. Comfort - excellent. Looks - in silver it turns heads and has been mistaken for a ZZ-R1100. Handling - surprisingly good. Weaknesses: Low-down power below 3,000rpm Resistance to corrosion in winter (Relatively) cheap suspension.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 A number one 600 sports tourer
22 February 2006 by chrisjones18

Only problems are the front brake pads stick in winter if not kept clean and gearchange is notchy when chain is to slack can get between 8 and 10 thousand miles to a set of tyres if ridden sensibly and its been 100% reliable Ive toured two up with all luggage over spain with no trouble at all. Strengths: All of it. Weaknesses: Rear shock a bit soft as standard.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 Damn good machine for little money - does it all
09 February 2006 by highlandbiker

Bought a 92 D model on a limited budget a couple of years ago, only problems I've had are down to the age of the bike. When I first bought it, I was commuting 100 miles to work on Monday morning, and same home on Friday night easily, very comfortable. It's quick, fairly cheap to maintain, not the top spec but can hold it's own, damn good allround machine. Only gripe is an annoying flatspot between 6-7000rpm - cruising speed in top, can turn sweeping overtakes into a gearshift tap dance. Strengths: Versatility, comfort, performance. Weaknesses: Gearbox notchy if chain isn't kept perfectly adjusted, suspension is basic, no underseat storage.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Excellent bike of it`s class
01 November 2005 by Cribbo

After recently returning to two wheels from a twenty year gap, I have found this bike to be perfect for getting back to riding. A very forgiving bike, dosen`t complain, it`ll do all you ask and more. Strengths: Comfort, build quality, Engine is Bomb-proof, very quick just when you want it. Weaknesses: Notchy G/Box (1-3), Soft rear-end.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Excellent All Rounder
24 October 2005 by karoobex

I used to ride this all over the country. Commuting from London to Manchester, commuting to Reading it handled all types of road fantastically. One of the most endearing features is the bikes low speed manoverability, it pulls at 1500 rpm and is quite agile through traffic, which means that it performs well as a commuter bike as well as the long haul down the motorway. Fuel efficiency is not bad, ridden sensibly you can expect 200+ miles to the tank, yet the rider can throw the bike down the twisties with the best. Strengths: Versatility. It is as good on the long haul as the in town commute. Reliability. I put 15000 on one of these with only a small problem with the injectors having lived outside through a particularly cold winter. Comfort. Pillions used to have trouble staying awake on long journeys. Weaknesses: Factory Set Up. Crank that back suspension down, otherwise you will whale around all over the place.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Brilliant real world bike
22 October 2004 by sizzleofbarum

If you want a practical day to day bike that has adrenalin pumping acceleration & top speed & can double (or treble) as a tourer this is the bike for you. 0 to 156 with heart stopping acceleration in comfort is where this bike is at. Oh, and by the way, weather protection is pretty good too. Strengths: Comfort, passenger comfort, weather protection, speed, acceleration, economy (35 to 60 mph depending on you), low seat (for short a___s). Weaknesses: Weight (198kg), soggy shock absorbers, rotten exhaust.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 A good touring / commuting bike, greatly overlooked.
01 August 2004 by PaulE3

Purchased in 2002 as a sports tourer, it has met that demand very well. Good examples are not difficult to find, these are not racing and scratching bikes so the owners tend to be a little more practical in their use. Smooth, very reliable, good weather protection. That said it is still reasonably quick but a little soft. Recommend an aftermarket rear shock, the orginal is not great. Something that can be adjusted easily. I replaced the exhaust with stainless down pipes and collector box for £350. Kawaski wanted £450 for the orginal parts...! Strengths: As above plus after market spares are more available than first seems. These do not tend to be listed so ask the advertisers in the MCN classifieds. The brakes are very good. Weaknesses: Steel parts can corrode easily. Without much cost / effort I have replaced various fitting with stainless and removed some brackets and repainted them. (Get to know your bike better). Look after the front brake seals, keep them calipers clean and the results are good.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
07 January 2002 by jamesboxall

Comfort is excellent. Bike is as fast as you'll ever need in the real world!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
Back to top