YAMAHA WR250X (2008 - on) Review

Year: 2011

Annual servicing cost: £200

Love this bike and having bought my thrid one, in mint condition, I will not be selling this one. Had probably over 50 bikes in my time, some good, some crap, but I keep going back to the WR250X because it suits my riding style and its such bloody fun. Been riding 47 years and this is the best bike, for me, I have ever had. I live rural, country lanes, forest windy roads, and its such fun to throw round the bends. Got three other bikes and this gets the most use.

Buying experience: Bought completely unseen off the internet which I have done with most of my bikes and cars. Then collected and delivered and really pleased with the bike.

Version: Black

Year: 2009

I had to write a review, because the MCN review is terrible! I've bought a wr250x in 2015, so I've owned it for about 8 years. I often ridden it daily to work. I would recommend this bike to anyone that is tall enough for it. Since many parts are shared with the wr250f, they are easy to come by. You can even buy the wheels and brakes from a wr250f, and convert it to off road. There is a huge aftermarket.Mods: Leo Vince Exhaust (it's CA legal and comes with a spark arrestor for off road). No Toil Super-Flo Air Filter Kit Power Commander SpeedoDRD Y1 Speedometer Calibrator manual cam chain tensioner Faster pull throttle tube Lower gear ratio (larger rear sprocket) Zeta's Armor Handguards Zeta carbon frame guard small clip on mirrors under the handlebars Rear fender delete Seat Concepts seat lightweight Lithium Ion Battery Flatland Racing Skid Plate ZETA CNC Machined Brake Folding Lever Righteous Stunt Metal Clutch

Buying experience: I got it used, I think I paid $3900 in 2015.

Year: 2010

Annual servicing cost: £100

This bike is certainly a keeper for me. I have 5 bikes currently and I love to chop and change so that I can try different bikes although I stick to Yamaha and sometimes Honda simply because I have had such great experiences over many years. This WR250 came along recently and wowow what an amazing piece of kit. (Whoever tested this bike for MCN should be questioned and or shot). These bikes were made in Japan and so they were terribly expensive and now at 13 years old the quality really shines through!! Mine starts and rides like a semi new bike and for a 250 is seriously fast and fun too. Fuel consumption is crazily low and performance GREAT. FUN FUN FUN!!!

Buying experience: Purchased from Alf England and goodness they found a good one!!! These guys are the best.

Year: 2013

24k mile valve adjustments. Its a 250 so no its not a rocket but it does what it does well. Great first bike and fun for experienced riders on the proper roads. Plus you can put wheels and regear and you have one of the best dual sports made.

Year: 2008

Had it new from 2010. Had all the RDs before, but someone killed off 2 strokes. Never a problem. Overtakes everything until you reach a quiet motorway, but beware the handle bars taking out transit wing mirrors at traffic lights. Goes over a ton, if you go flat on the tank and ignore the weave. 85+ sitting upright. Great if you hit standing water and take the weight back. Back Bridgestone does pop out on occasion and the front brake will perform rolling stoppies, despite my lack of talent. They’re rare now, but far more fun than sitting with your weight on the bars until you hit 60. Oh, they can also fly when required. Fun, but hurts after 100 miles.

Year: 2008

Annual servicing cost: £20

I learned to ride as an older person, licensed at 52. I've been riding the WR250x for thirteen years logging 20,000 miles. This was a beginner bike for me and I anticipated selling it after a year or two. That never happened. I don't want to own two motorcycles. I'd really like a Tracer 900 GT but every time I think about giving up the WR I hear this little voce saying "Don't do it!" I've read many comments from former WR owners who regretted their decision.There is a good chance that I'll never give up my WR. It's just that good.

Buying experience: Bought new from a dealer. based on the VIN# my WR was one of the first 1000 made. The bike was expensive for a quarter liter but the almost non-existent maintenance costs have more than made up for that. The independent shop who does my tires and inspections always reminds me that if I ever decide to sell my WR they want first option on it.

Year: 2009

I use the bike as work horses going short distances daily, it does the job well.

Buying experience: I have put some hand guards on mine to reduce the wind in the winter, some adjustable leavers to make the ride nicer and a exhaust for abit of noise.

Year: 2010

Annual servicing cost: £550

Just brilliant to ride and VERY well made. I have been riding for 35 years and this bike probably gave me the most fun. Not the fastest by any means but for the real world perfect (if you don't carry luggage or pillions any distance). Proves that you never stop learning how to ride better.

Year: 2008

An indestructible super moto with precise handling and excellent throttle response. Does exactly what is was designed for and much more. Enough to keep anyone entertained while still remaining usable.

Year: 2009

This is the lightest, most reliable, economical, most hi-tech supermoto money can buy. High maintenance race engines that require valve checks and oil changes every 1k miles you will not find a quicker 250cc supermoto. I've only been riding motorcycles a couple years and I scrape the foot pegs and have no chicken strips left. It helped me become a much better rider and I've been able to use what I've learned on my other bigger bikes.

I cannot believe the audacity of some of the reviews iv'e read. Coming from an owner of the 2008 wr250x model 3450 km it is one of the best sophisticated machines i've ever ridden in my life.

I'll call MCN out right now for being racist xenophobes. If this bike was European they would have heralded it greatly. But because it's Japanese, they give it such low ratings and misleading statistics. I have a Q4 FMF pipe, FMF programmer, and no other mods and can get 143 km/hr top speed. It is totally maintenance free unlike something like a KTM, or Ducati. Just change the oil. Then MCN turns around and gives stellar ratings to something dangerously underpowered like a Derbi DRD 125. Hey MCN, in case you don't know, World War II ended almost 70 years ago. Get over the hating!

i have the x version, also i have a set of sm pro dirt wheels with lower gearing. so any bike that can go round elsworth moto park in the intermediate class with dirt wheels on has got to be good. then put the sumo wheels on and out handle my mates monster. you are welcome to test my bike if you want. i dont think your review is fair at all. also it does about 85 mpg .

Quite where MCN got 80mph from, I have no idea but they obviosly didn't actualy ride one to the top speed (unless the rider was obease & they went uphill into a 50mph wind). Most 'stock' WR250X's (including mine) are good for 85-90mph. The power is available all through the rev & speed range. Noticably more than a learner restricted 125! Mine has a dep pipe, with air box flap removed & does a genuine 100mph. Handling was a little vague on the stock suspention settings but winding the rear preload up 3mm (I weigh 12 stone) cured all the problems. No chicken strips on my back tyre. It now handles like a dream & out corners all but the very brave. Sub 100mph there is little to beat it. It's very light, under 80 it flicks side to side better than any other bike I have ridden, including a few well known road racers. The super handling is paired with good rubber but this does need to be properly warmed (a few minutes) before you get the best out of it. If you doubt my comments, check out youtube to see footage of this bike being used to great efffect on go cart tracks & at 'handling' comps. MCN score this 2 stars for equipment. The main gripe being the seat. As others have stated, this softens up. For me this was at about 1k, after that, it felt as good as any other low capacity trialer. The controls are basic & functional, what more can you ask for? Quality is top notch & realiability will only be proved with time. The bike is reletively new but since it's inception ('08) has suffered no specific problems other than early models having a 7% low spedo. Aledgedly being set incorrectly, as it reads from the crank & didn't compensate for the difference in gear ratio & tyre/wheel size from the 'R' version. Basicallly you get what you pay for, this is a quality hi-tech bike. It don't come cheap. Of course you can get larger capacity, more powerfull bikes for less money but they are unrefined, heavy & dull in comparison, lacking the tech & quality. I am unimpressed by MCN's 'ameture' review of this bike. At best it is a 'shallow' & hurried attempt to get 'something' to press. I would have thought they would have taken the time to at least set the suspention up & take it to a suitable location to test the handling & top speed. Their review is ill informed & misleading. I have to say that on the face of this review, I wouldn't trust any other oppinions they put to press. Not a good situation for such a well thought of publication.

Cannot think why MCN came to this conclusion about the WR. This bike will get you from A to B with more fun than you could possibly expect. Expensive for a 250, but suspension/drivability easily make up for this. Shame there's no tacho. Little motor needs to be revved, so Yamaha's engineers have hopefully got the reliability sorted out.

I would tell anyone reading the MCN review to take with a grain of salt. A very small grain. British reviewers seen to revel in whining, complaining and nitpicking anything that's not from the Commonwealth. British reviewers would complain that Vichy water is too wet and bubbly, or that Italian gelato is too cold. England - the country that thinks stereos with 100 watts is for too much, and the country that has produced more unreliable lemons in motorsport history (they think rusting crap like Coopers and Jaguars are classics!) this side of the Atlantic. Forget this reviewer; the WR250X is tons of fun and rides with the ease and toqueyness of an enduro dirt bike, and sticking to the road like a sport bike. And unlike anything British it's reliable and requires hardly any maintenance.

I would also like to regiister my surprise at this review. I know that nearly every bike with a bad review will have some fanboys complaining about it, but seriously, you will be hard pressed to find ANYONE who would criticise the WR250R/X as you have. Even if every other criticism you made was correct, I don't see how you can give the engine 3 stars. This is arguably the best 250 single engine with road-going maintenance intervals ever built. You can't get any better in 2010 for such power with such economy and such low maintenance intervals. The engine is not derived from the YZ-F Motorcross range as you state, it's closest relative is actually the R1 motor... it's basically 1/4 of an R1, same cylinder and stroke, computer as all same diagnostic and error codes. Colloquially this engine is known as the R2. I've gotten mine up to 147km/h (90mph+) and regularly cruise on the freeway at 110km/h (the speed limit), all while getting 32km per litre (i think that's about 77mpg) and having gearing low enough to make it a rocket in suburban traffic. No 250 dual sport has done that, and done that so easily, ever before. Finally, I note your review of the WR125X is glowing, you say that its equipment is good, that the extra price is justified by the quality and low weight. Well, this 250 weighs 2KG less than the 125 wet, if your figure of 137kg in that review is correct, and it has all the same accessories.

Did MCN ride this bike? I think not, they must have just sat on it in a shop - The seat was hard for the 1st few hundred miles, I guess they never rode it to find it softens up. I've ridden the WR250X into London for the last 6 months. 80+ mpg, 90+ mph and it gets all the sport bike riders hot and bothered to see a 250cc super moto leave them at the lights, albeit only for the 1st 250 metres :-). The initial short gears and the weight of this bike mean that you can be first away from all but the most determined of sport bike riders. The bike is light and quick to turn. The stock suspension set up is soft, but if MCN had looked at the bike they would have found the suspension fully adjustable both front and rear. Everything except front pre load is changeable without stripping anything down. Filtering through London rush hour traffic is easy, as the bike is well balanced and nimble and the high seat position makes for a commanding view of the road with easy viewing of your blind spots. Highway riding is good up to national speed limits with no issues of rapidly getting to 70+mph quickly but it does get a bit noisy and the speed that the bike turns can make the bike feel very light. I got used to the sensation quite quickly as the bike remains firmly on the road even in the wind. Yamaha Japan does a fly screen which would help but Yamaha UK have no plans to sell it here. The brakes are strong and responsive and more than ample to stop the bike quickly. The long travel of the front suspension does mean that a level of dip has to be tolerated, some of this can be reduced by adjusting the suspension. It is a super motard after all! The biggest reason that I don't believe that MCN ever rode this bike is they failed to mention the only real gripe that I have with this bike and that is how jumpy the fuel injection is at very low revs. Overcoming this is simple matter of cracking open the throttle, but if you did want to ride slowly and sedately I understand the Power commander will resolve this minor irritation. I've given the bike 5 stars for value as bought the bike new and did not pay anywhere near the list price. Who does these days anyway?

I have to say I am totally confused by your slating of this motorcycle. While other reports I have read have not been completely complementary, they certainly think that (taking into account what the bike is) it is a fine motorcycle. By todays standards it has a quality feel and finish with excellant (fully adjustable) forks, brakes, shock etc. The engine is a rev hungry blast and its light weight makes every trip (on the twisties, admitedly) a grin inducing fest of tarmac warping breaking, awesome lean angles and confident power slides. This is around my fourtieth motorcycle of all shapes and sizes with many many more road tested and I have certainly not been dissapointed. Before purchase I was a little concerned about value for money......then I rode a Kawasaki Versys. Fit and finish even by Kawaski standards was poor and the vibes, for a twin, I found totally unacceptable. I was more than happy to pay the very small premium over this bike for for the quality engineering and finish found on the WR.