YAMAHA R6 (1998 - 2003) Review

At a glance

Owners' reliability rating: 3.9 out of 5 (3.9/5)
Annual servicing cost: £100
Power: 108 bhp
Seat height: Medium (32.3 in / 820 mm)
Weight: Low (373 lbs / 169 kg)

Prices

New N/A
Used £3,600

Overall rating

Next up: Ride & brakes
5 out of 5 (5/5)

There is something very satisfying about riding a bike as analogue as the R6. If you want a cheap track hack, a cosmetically tatty carbed R6 would fit the bill perfectly, while those wanting a budget supersport bike with a bit of spirit should also give one a go.

Ride quality & brakes

Next up: Engine
4 out of 5 (4/5)

Light, rapid steering and hard to fault on the track – ultimately the Yamaha YZF-R6's pegs will touch down but that takes some doing. The bars will waggle under power but the Yamaha YZF-R6 is a fast steering track bike so that’s to be expected. It can’t quite match the composition and easy turn in of the latest supersport 600s but it’s a small difference – chassis wear will be more significant on most machines.

Engine

Next up: Reliability
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The Yamaha YZF-R6 loves to rev – a 15,500 rpm redline was high for the time. As with a two-stroke you need to be heavy on the revs and clutch at low rpm to get going. Hit 6000rpm and the R6 wakes up, driving strongly as long as you are hard on the gasbefore the next kick in power at 10,000rpm where it really takes off towards its 15,500rpm redline.

Reliability & build quality

Next up: Value
3 out of 5 (3/5)

The Yamaha YZF-R6's finish is a mixed bag. Plenty of major parts resist the rigors of rain and salt well. But a few smaller parts let the Yamaha YZF-R6 down. Bolts, brackets and fasteners plus a handful of bigger components fur or rust up far too easily. Major Yamaha YZF-R6 reliability problems are extremely rare. Check for heavy oil consumption and any form of gearbox fault.

Value vs rivals

Next up: Equipment
4 out of 5 (4/5)

This is a popular, but value for money, class and it’s hard fought on price. The Yamaha YZF-R6 is not only the best bike from late 1998 to the end of 2000 it’s the best looking too so prices hold up quite well. Suzuki’s GSX-R is track capable but poor on the road, Honda’s CBR is a sound machine but revvy and the Kawaski’s more road focused. Find a Yamaha R6 for sale

Equipment

4 out of 5 (4/5)

Sports bikes don’t have to be crippling and impractical. And the Yamaha YZF-R6 is neither. The riding position’s pretty reasonable – touring’s possible although the seat could benefit from a gel insert. The Yamaha YZF-R6's instruments are comprehensive for the era and include an extra trip meter triggered by the fuel reserve. Above average underseat storgage, good headlights, passable mirrors.

Specs

Engine size 599cc
Engine type 16v in-line four, 6 gears
Frame type Aluminium twin spar
Fuel capacity 17 litres
Seat height 820mm
Bike weight 169kg
Front suspension Preload, rebound, compression
Rear suspension Preload, rebound, compression
Front brake Twin 298mm discs
Rear brake 220mm disc
Front tyre size 120/60 x 17
Rear tyre size 180/55 x 17

Mpg, costs & insurance

Average fuel consumption 43 mpg
Annual road tax £84
Annual service cost £100
New price -
Used price £3,600
Insurance group 14 of 17
How much to insure?
Warranty term Two year unlimited mileage

Top speed & performance

Max power 108 bhp
Max torque 55 ft-lb
Top speed 160 mph
1/4 mile acceleration 11.2 secs
Tank range 160 miles

Model history & versions

Model history

1998: Original Yamaha YZF-R6 launched.
2001: Updated Yamaha YZF-R6 includes quick release number plate hanger and most obviously LED tail lights.
2003: Yamaha YZF-R6 gets new swingarm, fuel injection replaces carbs, revised frame, five-spoke wheels.

Other versions

None.

MCN Long term test reports

MCN Fleet: What’s my R6 like in the wet?

MCN Fleet: What’s my R6 like in the wet?

My R6 is the only 600cc Supersport machine on the market with traction control and ABS as standard. In theory it should be able to cut it in the wet, but can it? I’d recently fitted brand new Metzeler Racetec rubber, which although are road legal, aren’t the perfect choice for standing water on a sl

Read the latest report

Owners' reviews for the YAMAHA R6 (1998 - 2003)

51 owners have reviewed their YAMAHA R6 (1998 - 2003) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your YAMAHA R6 (1998 - 2003)

Summary of owners' reviews

Overall rating: 4.7 out of 5 (4.7/5)
Ride quality & brakes: 4.7 out of 5 (4.7/5)
Engine: 4.8 out of 5 (4.8/5)
Reliability & build quality: 3.9 out of 5 (3.9/5)
Value vs rivals: 4.7 out of 5 (4.7/5)
Equipment: 4 out of 5 (4/5)
Annual servicing cost: £100
4 out of 5 2000 r6
09 December 2020 by Chris

Year: 2000

Annual servicing cost: £150

Best features. It’s cheap to buy, light, the brakes are fantastic, fuel economy is decent, insurance was cheap. 0 no claims on classic insurance was £150 year at 26

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Brakes where amazing to be honest, very strong never any issues whatsoever. I could go maybe 2 hours at most then needing a break due to the wrist pain

Engine 4 out of 5

Fast bike but it’s a r6 slow below 10,000rpm get it over that and it absolutely goes

Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5

Bought mine for £1700 from a private seller in feb 2018, 17k miles on the clock, great sports bike, comming from a cbr600f 1997 model this was in a different league, very sluggish around town you can tell it absolutely hates just short rides I know it’s obviously not for that, it loves just screaming to the redline and it went pretty well to be fair, I managed to get a indicated 167mph. Probably more realistically 158-159. Never really had any issues with it other than battery and battery rectifier. Nice and lightweight too. Would I buy another? Yes but a modern fuel injected one, it was my second big bike, I’ve now moved onto a 2008 675 Daytona now

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Serviced and maintained myself everything pretty easy

Equipment 3 out of 5

It’s a sports bike nowhere to put anything

Buying experience: Bike was priced up at £2000 managed to get to 1700 with no history , had no issues in my 2 years of ownership sold for 1800.

5 out of 5
04 March 2020 by alex

Year: 2000

I had a fz600 in my 20s and always wanted the logical upgrade, then I got one, a 2000 r6, and man, what a world of difference, this thing is a beast, shift around 12-15k and, if it had wings, you would be FLYING.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
3 out of 5 Don't buy this generation of R6.
25 December 2017 by Micena

Year: 2002

Annual servicing cost: £50

Overall very average for a used 600cc. Amazing motor but everything else is poor. Stunning looks. Prone to gear box and electrical issues. No low range or mid range power.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Feel like Rossi in a corner on this bad boy. Extreme riding position. Weight is over handle bars. To most people they find this uncomfortable but I prefer this riding position. What type of douce buys a sports bike and wants comfort? Go fast or go home.

Engine 5 out of 5

Amazing motors these Yamaha engineers make. Firecracker top end that makes you feel like you're in warp speed. No power at all under 7k rpm. Hit 8k this thing wakes up. Hit 10k you're like holy s**t! Hit 12k-16k you better be holding on because this thing is a rocket.

Reliability & build quality 2 out of 5

I may have had a lemon but reliability on these first generation Yamaha R6 are no good. I had massive electrical issues that I could never get sorted out. Battery was never being charged. I replaced to a oem Yamaha battery, stator and rectifier. Checked all connections and I continue to burn out electrical components. Mitsubishi supplies the electrical components and that's all you should know about that. This electrical system is no good.

Value vs rivals 3 out of 5

Average Japanese parts price

Equipment 4 out of 5

It's a sports bike bro.

Buying experience: Honestly DON'T Buy this generation.

4 out of 5
09 July 2017 by michael hayes

Year: 2000

cracking bike rev manic rocket, but lacks tractability around town have, to change gear, a little often, favour zx6r for town.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 WHITE & RED 99 5EB R6
06 February 2016 by Justin

Year: 1999

Nice wee bikes, I've owned most late 90's bikes and this is the fastest but personally I enjoyed my GSXR 600 SRAD more, I enjoyed both of them more. The R6 build quality is shabby, thin low quality fairing (yes as standard). My Verdict is the Honda CBR600 F3 98 model is comfier a tad slower but not much, makes every day riding easy, if your wanting this R6 as an everyday bike go for it, I'm only 5ft6 and I didn't find it cramped in any way. Infact this is more comfy to ride than a SRAD. Very quick for a pre-injection 600! below 6k there is nothing what so ever, but but twist the throttle, be committed to every corner and you'll be trying to have fun and not lose your license at the same time haha! Oh and lets face it the 5EB is the best looking pre 2000 600cc supersports.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
3 out of 5 The Emperor's Clothes
03 November 2015 by Loz

Year: 2001

The voice of reason

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

The bike is probably best when it is stationery. My bike was horribly unstable at speed and refused to hold a line in corners. This was with new Pilot 2cts at the correct pressures. No doubt it would have benefitted from a suspension fettle but I was so underwhelmed by the engine I decided to just sell the bike.

Engine 3 out of 5

Definite powerband starting around 8.5k revs, which makes road riding a pain in the butt at times as the midrange is really poor. It's not just me that thinks this, check online reviews elsewhere.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

I was very impressed with the build quality of this bike I have to say, although the rectifier packed up. (but I only had the bike for four months)

Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5

It has everything a sportbike needs and nothing more. Digital dash is clear and well thought out.

Buying experience: Bought privately for 1900 in red. Average mileage but overall a very clean bike.

5 out of 5
07 August 2015 by Gazza

Year: 2002

My first big bike. Excellent choice. Handles well, deliveres all the power when you need it. Pure fun.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 33bhp->108bhp
07 March 2014 by chazmeercat

I was still on my restricted (33bhp) licence when I purchased this, and the acceleration was good, and overtaking was easy. However, once the restrictor was off this thing turned into a missile! The acceleration is fantastic, and just keeps going and sounds amazing. The seat and bars are comfortable enough for a few hours riding. I keep looking at other bikes, but everytime I look at my R6 I can't think of anything better looking (in my price range) that I'd rather have.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Amaaazing!
29 May 2012 by Harvey11

First sports 600, definitely made the right choice!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 1999 Yamaha YZF R6
31 August 2011 by DuNkZz1993

Beautiful

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Quality
17 July 2011 by kaneh

Hey, I bought my 99 R6 in july 2010 and since then i cant get enough, it was my first 600 and the bike is bullet proof, all i can say is amazing!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 2002 R6
13 May 2011 by Kando

Shocked at the speed this bike accelerates it’s a brilliant bike and well worth the money. Picked mine up for £2500 with only 7500 miles on the clock. Complete bargain. If you want a fast bike with excellent handling you can’t go wrong with an R6.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Awesome Bike
11 May 2011 by

I Love this bike! I can’t imagine ever wanting to sell it, a definite future classic. The exhaust sound is amazing and it accelerates so hard it can easily keep up with bigger more modern sports bikes so long as you keep up the revs. The R6 handles like a dream and the brakes are good too. The riding position is good for its class defiantly more comfortable than the latest 600’s. If you’re thinking of buying a 600 super sport you can’t go wrong with this bike.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My '03 R6
12 December 2008 by gdembs

I bought my '03 R6 a year ago in 2007 with only 5,000 miles on it for $5200 - what a great value! I simply cannot believe how much power is available above 10,000 rpms for a 600cc bike. I did level 3 and 4 with Keith Code at Mid-Ohio with my R6, and can't be happier with the performance, especially for what I paid for it. It feels very light and steers quickly and precisely. I can't imagine a better track day bike for $5,000!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 My R6
26 August 2008 by Vin Petrol

I passed my test 6weeks back,first bike is an R6 and i have to say i love it with a passion, i was looking in the Honda direction as i was always a massive Honda car nut but something about the R6 appealed and god am i glad i got it.Mine however has been modified and i do have to be aware that im not on my moto-cross bike at times...but overall id say this bike is perfect for a first bike if given the respect it deserves.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 1999 Yamaha R6
21 May 2008 by Jitzu

My first bike was an 1999 R6, I fell in love when I got it and loved it for a number of years b4 selling her and buying an '02 Honda f4i. Im not sure why I find the f4i has better handling but it just seems to be a smoother ride. I wouldnt give the yami a bad review cause it was a great bike for the 3 years that I had it! www.UsedMotorcycleDealers.info

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 R6
05 March 2008 by FERGY.1

i'M 5'8'' SHORT ARSE AND THE 1998 BIKE HAD ME ON ONE FOOT. GREAT ON THE ROAD SOME UN RELIABILITY ISSUES LIKE THE GEAR BOX REMINES ME OF THE FZR600. YAMS SEEM TO HAVE A CLUNKY BOX AWKWARD CHANGE AND NOT BULLET PROOF GEAR BOX. PUTS A SMILE ON YOUR FACE THOUGH BUT THEN I'VE ALWAYS LIKED THE YAM'S.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
5 out of 5 R6
06 February 2008 by r6angelbaby

i love the R6,its the best 600 i couldve ever chosen as a first bike! Its reliable and very comfortable. Small and girly i think too. well worth the money i paid out for her. Shesw very nippy and just love the way it sounds. a very fun bike to start of with!

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 2000 r6
07 November 2007 by estwinguk

after a gap of 10yrs i got back into biking ,first with an 01 zx6r nice machine but i didnt get on with the handling,then got the r6 ,cant fault it put on a damper ,new pair of bt014s .handlings superb .theres more than enough power and if ya wind it up goes into warp drive .ive had it a year always starts on the button .all in all for some one looking at getting a user freindly sports bike i would highly recormend one of these.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 Comfy ride
17 September 2007 by xxxridemexxx

Great steering, easy handling Over all a fun ride. Bit nicer on the track than on a dirt road though! Taking it off the track I'd recommend a new seat or you could wind up with a very sore bum

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 new on a r6
08 July 2007 by andy7rd

the reson i learnt to ride was cause i had seen the r6 so the day i passed i brought one every one seid IT' THOUGH YOU OFF IN A HEART BEAT (even the man i had it off cheers mate!!!!) i'v taken it realy easy with iv found it comfortable for me and my pillion it got all the power i need and handles great fast and responsive so im two weeks in to rideing now heres hopeing it doesnt spit me off in a heart beat from what iv can see if it happens its my fault not the bike they go slow as well as fast the bike does'nt decide i do so over all im happy i lisened to my self and didnt get put off

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 The best pre 2005 600 I've ridden. Try before you buy.
21 July 2006 by andyadny

I'm 5'6" tall and found the R6 quite comfortable. It feels like the fastest 600 out there although I haven't ridden the 2003 zx636. I think that the tank is fairly short so I don't get the usual; back pain. I owned a gsxr 600 k1 and it was awful. It didn't handle had no low down guts and was like a torture rack for my back. Could have been the set up by previous owner that made the handling and power so bad. Much faster and lighter than a pre 2002 zx6r and much more exciting than a older cbr. The handling is excellent it feels light and flick-able. Mine has loads of low down grunt. Not sure if the gearing (front rear sprockets) has been down geared. The gearbox is terrible between 1st and second. If buying get a test ride and if it jumps out of second while being revved go find another one to look at. Can bump about a bit over bumps around corners but I've got used to it. Low speed turns ie u turns on mini roundabouts can find you banging your thumbs against the side of the tank. Strengths: Power, light weight, handling. Weaknesses: Gearbox between 1st and second can be iffy. Low speed tight turns need care.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
29 October 2005 by minty69

Passed my Direct Access in 2000 Jumped straight on an R6 everyone said "It'll spit you off" but it can be the most forgiving bike or a right bastard depends on your right wrist. 5 years later still going strong love it, fast, manic and still whoops the new 600's. Strengths: Reliable, Fast, Comfortable. Weaknesses: Clunky gearbox.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 After 4 years on a Honda VFR400 (NC30) I decided it was time to step up to a sports 600.
13 July 2005 by brandsnc30

After much deliberation between a CBR/GSXR/ZX6R/R6, the latter fitted almost every criteria within my £3500-4000 price range and is a bike I've always wanted to own since it was launched. The R6 is utterley gorgeous, unlike the gixxers it looks totally unique. When I bought the bike the handling was a bit nervous to say the least, I think the previous owner had been 'fiddling'. However, a few adjustments to the suspension (thanks to an MCN supplement I had kept from a couple of years ago) and it's now absolutely spot-on (well done MCN). So far I've had no major head shakes and don't consider a steering damper necessary. The only changes from standard are a road-legal Micron Delta+ exhaust to enhance the sound and some clear indicator lenses. Nothing else is required - just get on and ride it. Can't wait to take it round Brands Indy circuit to properly compare the handling to my old NC30. Strengths: Looks, performance, handling, the size (it's tiny!), and it?s relatively comfy for a sportsbike. Weaknesses: Low-speed handling (but that's not what I bought it for!!).... oh, and the standard exhaust looks too big.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Delicious looking track bike
10 November 2004 by flashboyuk

As a relatively new rider I had always fancied an R6, but decided to play it safe and serve a years apprenticeship on a 600 Hornet. Safe to say that I was overjoyed when I purchased a mint condition R6 at the end of year one. With a few cosmetic mods the bike looks the tits, however I made the classic decision of ignoring the reviewers comments, 'that this bike was made for the track'. The R6 is scorching at high revs, however cornering on B roads is hard work and you always seem to be between gears. I love the build quality, styling and top end power, however I would have prefered more low revs power. If only Yamaha still manufacturered a 750cc sports! Strengths: Top End - Captain Kirk, Scotty and Spock will be joining you as you reach the red line and enter Warp Speed. Good looking too! Weaknesses: The only weaknesses of the R6 is low down grunt! Whilst this is not a V-Twin, the power at low revs is virtually non-existent.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Great handling bike combined with excellent brakes and engine-especially above 10+
01 July 2004 by Katohfan

The handling of this bike is fantastic as you can carry alot more corner speed than a big thou, meaning u can mix it with the big boys, until the straights that is, the engine is great too especially at 10+ which sounds lovely when a race can is fitted. Strengths: Brakes, engine, hadling, build quality. Weaknesses: Clunkiness in the gearbox between first and second.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
20 November 2002 by chrisnic

Used every day for 2 years (through the winter also) absolutely 100% reliable and bullet proof ? The best sports bike I have ridden so far, a true 'one on one' experience.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
23 August 2002 by martinerasmus

The bike is great, really fun above 10k rpm. Did trip to france 1700 miles in 5 days, not that uncomfortable and had loads of fun. Don't like the head shakes.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
31 July 2002 by klink

I have had bike since new and had micron fitted and the sound is awesome, the metzler tyre has added a new demension to the bike bike soften the dampening at the front one can corner with greater confidence and speed. Check out these tyres you wont be disapointed. Looking forward to sept 2003 new f/inj model.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
28 July 2002 by gazzasam

This is my first sports bike after riding a GPX 250 for a few years and all I can say is wow. The bike handles,moves and stops incredibly. Maybe I will think differently after a couple of years but I really dont think I will feel the need for a litre sports bike. But as they say NEVER SAY NEVER. If you are in the market for a 600 an R6 will not disappoint. I am anxiously waiting for the arrival of the all new 2003 model, because if it is as good as reports suggest then I will be at the front of the queue.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
02 July 2002 by apricot

Quicker than zx6r cramped twitchy front end when accelerating hard. Drops into bends easily. Lovely engine. Looks the bollocks. Wrists getting used to weight on them. Couldnt be arsed to run it in any more than 200 miles. Takes getting used to after zx6r.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
30 June 2002 by stozzer

Love it to bits. Thought about moving to an R1, test rode one for a day, but was glad to get on my R6.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
11 June 2002 by gsxrheaven

Love the bike so quick and responsive.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
22 April 2002 by shabba2

Great bike, I sold my '00 GSXR750 for it. Bike is near as fast and handles much better for me. Best bike I have ridden, better than an R1.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
18 April 2002 by woza

This is my second R6. The first was a 99 model which I had in the UK. The first time I rode it quick was to mallory and found the light front and slight head shake a bit unsettling from my previuos 98 ZX6RG1. I also found it difficult to steer slowly (u turns etc) particularly right compared to the Kwak however I've never tired of it's looks. The light front and head shake is now an attraction and after a couple of track days I now feel very confident with the whole set up. My new R6 has endured the crap bumpy roads of Sydney commuting to work and will see it's first visit to Eastern Creek race track in May.  Bring it on.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
17 April 2002 by fragdeath

Not as mad as last bike an R1 but just as much fun as slightly lower speeds.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
05 April 2002 by rmop1

Love this bike, best sports bike I have owned. It is very easy to ride and lovely to look at.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
11 January 2002 by Carrera4

Luvley jubley.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
08 January 2002 by etlggwn

Bike very quick to turn. Dropped the forks 10mm and changed standard suspension to stop head shakes.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
04 November 2001 by windsurfer

I was not happy with the bike until I changed the suspension to the PB settings mentioned in the R6 talk bike section. This transformed the bike. The bike is now much more planted during hard acceleration and holds a sweet predictable line through corners (If you are running wide, it is not you bottling it, it's the bike, trust me!).

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
23 October 2001 by scott dawkins

WHO SAYS THEY'RE UNCOMFY ? I'M 6FT AND 15 STONE AND I CAN RIDE IT ALL DAY LONG, IF ONLY I CAN GET THE FRONT WHEEL TO STAY ON THE ROAD.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
19 October 2001 by andy perks

Love it. Build quality seems good. Kills my wrists. Looks mean. Goes fast. Roll on summer ffs!!!!!!!!!!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
15 October 2001 by Pete Mitton

What can be said that hasn't already, best bike I have ever bought. The only bad thing is it plays havoc with your wrists.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
02 August 2001 by Ultraviolet

Swapped it for an R1 two weeks ago, for more low down power/ midrange and got it! But... the R6 has better brakes (maybe still bedding in the R1`s), and can definitely change direction mid corner faster than anything I`ve ever ridden (except my FS1E). The R6 did seem less stable at high speed than the R1. If you're thinking of buying one ....just do it. Mine will be missed!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
28 May 2001 by painter

Great sports bike one up not for the steady rider need a rest after 40 miles or so but great fun.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 My Review
20 May 2001 by ajsr6

The worst thing about my bike is the gearbox shifting from first to second gear nearly rips my toes from my foot and the noise from doing so is like a bag of spanners in a blender! apart from that its brilliant!

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 2 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
16 May 2001 by stevieR6

This bike has been ok. I am on my 2nd R6 as with the first one I broke 2 crankshafts within 3000 miles. so I am wary of reliability with this one. I feel that corrosion is bad on footrests, brackets etc but that may be due to me living in north Scotland.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
14 April 2001 by drfbxxx

I like the fact that this bike looks so good, handles so well, and has so much power.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 My Review
28 February 2001 by Russell Bellinger

I love the look of it and the screaming banshee howl when I ring its neck. The response is still awesome when the revs are high but I think I need more low down grunt now so I may trade for an RSV or a Blade [ if Honda can sort the colour scheme ]. 100% reliable, its a joy.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 My Review
28 February 2001 by dazzie

Love the bike to bits, awesome. Came with the rubber around the left wingmirror loose, as was the black plastic above the left ram air feed. At first service pointed these faults out twice to Carnell and still they weren't fixed. Took them an hour to adjust the front headlights. Passenger footpegs and end can already starting to corrode, despite regular cleaning.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
3 out of 5 My Review
28 February 2001 by Richard Green

The R6 is an excellent bike. Although I would consider myself a steady rider, the bike has never given me any dodgy moments. The power is excellent above 8000 rpm and the steering is quite quick, which I like. The weight is also a great advantage, only 165 Kgs ish.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
Back to top