YAMAHA MT-03 (2006 - 2016) Review

At a glance

Owners' reliability rating: 3.6 out of 5 (3.6/5)
Annual servicing cost: £190
Power: 45 bhp
Seat height: Medium (31.7 in / 805 mm)
Weight: Low (385 lbs / 174 kg)

Prices

New N/A
Used £2,500 - £3,200

Overall rating

Next up: Ride & brakes
4 out of 5 (4/5)

Visually stunning and mechanically sound, Yamaha’s trick new "roadster motard" creates its own little niche in the market.

Ideally an urban/commuter tool, the Yamaha MT-03 gives you more than enough fun if you want some bendy weekend scratching too. Handling is superb but just a little more horsepower would’ve really broadened the Yamaha MT-03's appeal.

Ride quality & brakes

Next up: Engine
4 out of 5 (4/5)

Stunning agility and a forward riding position bring out the motard aspects of the Yamaha MT-03. Clutch and throttle action are spot on and the brakes (lifted from the Fazer) are excellent. The Yamaha MT-03's  flash, lateral suspension system (with side-mounted shock) takes care of comfort while the rider can cane the bike around town or corners knowing those wide bars give it excellent manoeuvrability.

Engine

Next up: Reliability
4 out of 5 (4/5)

Like Aprilia’s Pegaso, the Yamaha MT-03 takes its engine from Yamaha’s XT660: a proven motor that works in this dinky little chassis. Smooth fuel injection and loads of low to midrange torque mean town and twisty riding is huge fun. The Yamaha MT-03 is a bit breathless up top though: it’s not really up to a long haul.

Reliability & build quality

Next up: Value
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The Yamaha MT-03 is well finished with excellent attention to detail: just look at that beautiful alloy swingarm. The engine’s tried and tested (so should be reliable) and the whole Yamaha MT-03 has been put together with originality, flair and, by the looks of things, without stinting too much on quality. Early days though…

Value vs rivals

Next up: Equipment
4 out of 5 (4/5)

A quality motorcycle at this price is good news. Scratchers will love throwing the Yamaha MT-03 around and newbies will learn to corner like Rossi with its brilliant handling. The top end may be a bit lacking, however, and there’s always the Suzuki SV650 or Kawasaki’s ER-6n waiting in the wings, costing less and with around 20bhp more oomph. Find a Yamaha MT-03 for sale

Equipment

4 out of 5 (4/5)

Sharing its genes with the MT-01, the Yamaha MT-03 has angular bodywork, a funky little headlamp and angry twin underseat pipes. The clocks are basic (digital speedo/analogue rev counter) but that suits the motard look. Numerous Yamaha MT-03 aftermarket bits are available, including hand guards, a flyscreen, seat covers and a fetching Akrapovic end can. Yum.

Specs

Engine size 660cc
Engine type 4v single cylinder, 5 gears
Frame type Tubular steel
Fuel capacity 15 litres
Seat height 805mm
Bike weight 174kg
Front suspension None
Rear suspension Preload
Front brake Twin 298mm discs
Rear brake 245mm disc
Front tyre size 120/70 x 17
Rear tyre size 160/60 x 17

Mpg, costs & insurance

Average fuel consumption 56 mpg
Annual road tax £117
Annual service cost £190
New price -
Used price £2,500 - £3,200
Insurance group 11 of 17
How much to insure?
Warranty term Two year unlimited mileage

Top speed & performance

Max power 45 bhp
Max torque 41 ft-lb
Top speed 100 mph
1/4 mile acceleration 14.6 secs
Tank range 185 miles

Model history & versions

Model history

2006: Yamaha MT-03 launched, following the 2005 introduction of its (very) big brother: the Yamaha MT-01. The new, little bike is described by Yamaha as a “roadster motard”.

MCN Long term test reports

Long term update: Small bike that thinks big

Long term update: Small bike that thinks big

“What engine is it again?” a friend asks as I park the Yamaha outside a local café after a Sunday morning spin. She has a Suzuki SV650 and can’t believe the MT-03 is only 321cc when it looks “just like a proper bike”. And there’s a reason for that, the parallel-twin Yamaha is 100% a proper bike. Tha

Read the latest report

Owners' reviews for the YAMAHA MT-03 (2006 - 2016)

26 owners have reviewed their YAMAHA MT-03 (2006 - 2016) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your YAMAHA MT-03 (2006 - 2016)

Summary of owners' reviews

Overall rating: 3.7 out of 5 (3.7/5)
Ride quality & brakes: 4.6 out of 5 (4.6/5)
Engine: 3.9 out of 5 (3.9/5)
Reliability & build quality: 3.6 out of 5 (3.6/5)
Value vs rivals: 3.9 out of 5 (3.9/5)
Equipment: 3.3 out of 5 (3.3/5)
Annual servicing cost: £190
5 out of 5 Full-size A2 bike with character
18 July 2024 by Chris

Version: 660cc

Year: 2006

Reliable, nimble, good power for the city and back roads. Not great for touring. Owned for 2 years. One of the best A2 bikes and I've tried plenty. I've also owned a Ninja 300 for 2 years, and ridden 2017 Honda CB500, Duke 390, RC390, A2-restricted MT07, ER-5, restricted Shiver etc. as well as many 35+kw bikes up to a Fireblade.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

A lot of fun to hoon on in the city. Engine pulls like a train up to around 100kmh/60mph then drops off in power after 150kmh/90mph. Brakes are really strong. No dive in the forks under hard braking due to the geometry - it feels like a supermoto and you feel really in control with a relatively high, upright seating position with wide handlebars. If you dont look down you forget there's a bike under you and it feels like youre flying. Not great for long distances. It's very boring on the highway and although there's power to overtake, the engine feels best in the city or in twisty roads where you are engaging gears, braking and accelerating all the time.

Engine 5 out of 5

For a 660 single, it's super reliable, has great torque and character. Awesome sound on the overrun after it's warmed up, even with stock pipes. When lugging the engine at low RPM's before it's warmed up, feels agricultural and it doesn't like constant high speeds. Vibrates a lot in low rpm under hard acceleration, but that's the nature of a single cylinder.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

It's a super reliable engine, the quality of parts even on a 2006 (almost 20 year old) bike that wasn't immaculately cared for, showed that it's a well-built machine. No rusted bolts at all even when parked outdoors under a cover, no issues with reliability. Compared to my MT07 where after only one or two years of ownership and constant cleaning, rust started forming on the swingarm - MT03 has an aluminum swingarm which doesnt rust.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Very cheap to maintain. The spark plug is easy to get to, only one cylinder to check valve clearance after covering big miles which is also easy. The only pain in the ass is the battery. In order to access it you have to remove the gas tank.

Equipment 3 out of 5

Equipment is as basic as it comes, but this bike doesn't really need much. No ABS, no fuel gauge (a low-fuel light) - of course no TC. Dunlop Mutant tires (not EOM) were fantastic on this bike. Aftermarket cans can be great but the stock exhaust is decent too once engine warms up. Soft seat but for taller/long-legged riders it can be cramped in the hip after long rides.

Buying experience: I looked at a few examples before buying mine - they used to go around 2000-2500 euros, up to 4000 for a pristine example. Just make sure it's rust-free and looked after. The engines are super reliable and it's generally cheap to maintain.

3 out of 5 Owned for 5 years
23 August 2019 by Dave

Version: 2008

Year: 2007

Although I only gave it 3 stars I would recommend this bike, but only as a commuter or for small back lane blasts. I've had it for 5 years and its been pretty reliable only needing some shocks due to pitting (don't buy unofficial Yamaha ones they rust quickly) and serviceable items. They handle well up to medium speed bends and have wide bars for easy riding around in town traffic. The engine is pretty rubbish in todays age. It's slow after about 50mph and doesn't have a lot of character apart from single cylinder traits, vibey, bangy and lumpy at times. I went out the other week with some friends on triumph 675 Daytona's and could generally keep up until we got to longish straights and then they were much much quicker, but if you're relatively fast around corners you can keep with them on country lanes or at least not fall too far behind. I had litre bike before this and I've noticed I definitely spend a lot more of the time going the right speed, but still having the same amount of fun, so that's good. I keep mine outside under a cover and lots of stuff has gone a bit rusty, but its an old bike now. It always starts even after 4 months of winter, first time. I have rode back to Essex from Bristol a few times and it will do it but you're not exactly feeling fresh after a 2.5hr stint on the m4/m25/m11 and the seat is uncomfortable after around an hour. looking back now I probably would have thrown another grand in the pot and got a vtwin or 3 cylinder bike but I guess you have to draw the cash line somewhere.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 2 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5

Buying experience: Private

5 out of 5 Not just for beginners
14 March 2019 by Paul

Year: 2018

Great fun, simple, basic bike that when you wind it up goes really well and is really fast through the twisties. I bought this bike as a town runaround, as my GS is too big and heavy in town. Now it is the first set of keys I pick up for anything less than full-on touring. The bike sometimes throws false neutrals when changing gear with the throttle closed.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Not a bike to tour on but no discomfort on a one-and-a-half hour ride. Bike is light and brakes are adequate - rear brake is needed if you want to stop in a hurry.

Engine 5 out of 5

Sweet engine that loves to rev.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

All OK so far.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Built to a price from a component standpoint but well put together.

Equipment 3 out of 5

You get what you pay for. However the dash has a surprising amount of information.

4 out of 5 Good thumper, good fun for A2 bike.
13 March 2018 by Thumpedout

Version: 660 cc single

Year: 2010

Great little runner. Owned one for a year now, all year round driving, doesnt let me down. Great acceleration up to 80 mph, bike can go faster but really doesn't like it (topped it out at 110 with some revs remaning, but really doenst feel good). Highway trips are possible but just cruise at 75. Vibrations are really not that bad. I would recommend the Kev 0² mod and an aftermarket exhaust: the stock form of the bike is somewhat agricultural. Keep in mind that the aftermarket cans are very expensive for this bike, so if you come across one on a secondhand site that is equipped with one, that can be a massive bonus. I commute on it, but the bike begs to be taken out to a twisty road, where it really lives. (So I try to do that as much as I can :) )

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Very strong brakes, but the rear one locks up very easily ! all the weight is in the front of the bike.

Engine 3 out of 5

The engine is fun and a lot of torque, fun bike especially for an A2 license holder. BUT: the stock form of the bike can be agricultural: surging, stalling out of nowhere,... I added a kev 0² mod and aftermarket exhaust and it is much better, but not totally fixed. I once stalled on the inner circle of a roundabout which was very dangerous. Keep that in mind when buying this motorcycle. Engine should be super reliable.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Never failed, always starts. Paint starts chipping a bit on the handlebar and on the swingarm near the chain adjusters, but that's normal since you have little room to turn a wrench when adjusting the chain, so you hit the paint a bit. The dashboard looks cool but feels like cheap plastic.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Had a massive service done to it ( bought it cheap but needed new tyres, chain and sprockets, valve check interval reached, oil,...) and it was 530 pounds. But that is a big maintenance interval so "normal" ones should be a lot cheaper. Fuel consumption: best 5,7 L/ 100 km ( 49 MPG), if you drive hard and sporty this will be more ofcourse, probably around 7,5 L/100 km (37 MPG)

Equipment 3 out of 5

Nothing special, the dash looks cool but feels a bit cheap. Got a small windscreen with it. No abs.

Buying experience: The bike is quite rare in my country (Belgium) because it was way to overpriced when it came out. The Duke 690 is probably better overall (except maybe reliability?) but now the bike is perfect for the A2 license ! Paid 1800 euro for mine (1600 pounds) with takeover of my old XR125L. The bike had 17 000 kms ( 10500 miles).

4 out of 5 Extremely reliable engine
18 August 2016 by RichOn2Wheels

Year: 2007

Annual servicing cost: £200

Extremely reliable engine & a torque curve to make you grin all day!

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

Extremely vibey at high speed, but then again it is a big bore single & not best suited to long distance. The suspension is okay but on bumpy roads I get a sore spine & legs after a while.

Engine 5 out of 5

Brilliant little engine with a great torque curve. It will out-accelerate everything under 600cc other than dedicated supersports.

Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5

The engine is bulletproof. Unfortunately other things have less then perfect quality. Both the headlight & tail bulbs both broke (twice) due to vibration, I had to rewire everything backwards from the battery due to corrosion, the amount of rust on the bike even the summer was alarming. It appears the mechanical soundness of the actual engine was not carried over to the cosmetic & other bits. Bolts also worked loose & seized despite the bike being well looked after.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5

Basic. Neutral indicator, rev counter, digital trip/odo/speedometer. Fuel warning light.

Buying experience: Bought mine from a dealer second hand.

5 out of 5 MT 03 2016
05 March 2016 by Dandare21

Year: 2016

Definitely! 😄😄😄😄😄😄

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Excellent quality of equipment fitted, including ABS.

Engine 5 out of 5

How do they get so much torque out of such a little motor. Which will happily run to 12000 rpm (when run in).

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Recently purchased (32 miles old) so I cannot really comment on its longevity as yet. However looking at the quality to detail of the fittings and the excellent quality of paint. I do not have any cause or concern for any potential future issues.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Unknown as yet

Equipment 5 out of 5

Fuel Gauge, ABS, Temp Gauge, Gear Selection Gauge, Average Miles to the Gallon and Change Up Light. What else would you want??

Buying experience: Skellerns Worcester - what an amazing service by all present. The best that I've ever experienced.

4 out of 5 Small can be Beautiful
15 February 2016 by John Willis

Year: 2016

Annual servicing cost: £177

Best; small, light, good handling, fast enough, looks cool, nice noise. Not so good; no wind protection, a little cramped. Would definitely recommend this bike.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

The bike is at its best in town or the twisties. Not so good on motorways and dual carriageways, though it has enough performance to handle it. Cracking all round bike for the real world. I would not want to be the pillion, but its ok to ride between refills.

Engine 5 out of 5

Like; Revvy, smooth, grunty, nice torque for its size throughout the range, doesn't feel stressed at high speed cruise. Less good; its not an SV!

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Too new to tell, but it looks very well finished and its a Yamaha, so won't break down!

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

That was the cost of insurance (no no claims). Too new to know servicing costs but expect around £200

Equipment 5 out of 5

Decent rubber (Michelin Street Pilot tyres), fuel and gear indicators useful. Recommend fuel tank protectors, crash bobbins and a screen.

Buying experience: Bought from an excellent dealer - friendly and efficient. Interested in the bike.

3 out of 5 Great first bike
22 June 2015 by chr151978

Year: 2007

Relatively low horsepower makes it a great first "big" bike to learn on without getting into trouble. Punchy and satisfying blatting around on twisty country roads. Slow on motorways. Engine cuts out occasionally at low rpms

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

Wind blast and only 5 gears make it impractical on motorways unless you keep it under 70. Its definitely at its best on fast twisties.

Engine 4 out of 5

Sweet spot is 5000-6000 rpm on a twisty A road, sounds wonderfully raucous. Drive train/engine very lumpy and jerky at low speed. It's underpowered compared to other mid weight naked's so plan overtaking manoeuvres carefully.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Very solid so far - 1 year, 6000 miles, all seasons commuting in London, no problem

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Needed new chain, sprockets and rear light bulb at 20,000 miles which is fair enough. Been getting 40-50 mpg

Equipment 3 out of 5

Great headlight, minimal instrumentation (a good thing!). Needs a tail tidy as i hate the way the number plate brake light assembly jiggles around..

5 out of 5 City riding my MT-03
06 June 2012 by drnqrk

Here is the youtube video I'v posted: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xziygupgT7o MT-03 is a Fun City Bike that brings a smile to your face :)

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 Great fun, but a couple of points worth noting...
13 April 2012 by

I’ve had my 58 plate MT for about a month now, so posting my thoughts as I found some of the other reviews on here helpful, but there were a couple of things about the bike I've noticed weren't mentioned. Firstly, as others say, this bike isn't best suited for the motorway. It'll do it, but the lack of fairing, relatively lightweight chassis and low gearing mean that motorway riding is not its forte. My daily commute is all London-based, so this was not a major issue for me. Whilst the MT is best suited for town riding, don't, however, expect smooth filtering like you’d get with a straight four. The characteristics of its big single cylinder engine push you to drive it hard, hammering around the outside of traffic and slamming on the brakes at the lights! In fact, driving the MT smoothly at slow speeds is nigh-on impossible as it surges quite noticeably when doing less than 30mph – a characteristic that, from browsing multiple forums, appears to affect all bikes that this injected big single is used in and for which there is no conclusive fix. Handling is good, but, because of the surging, low speed cornering takes some getting used to, with extra clutch control needed. There's no ABS option though and, with all of the weight at the front of the bike, the rear wheel locks up VERY easily. Think this is made slightly more prominent as the brake pedal is a bit of stretch if you have big feet, which probably means I’m stamping on it a little harder than I would normally. However, if you need to stop in a hurry, I’d advise using the front brake for about 95% of your efforts! Economy wise, I’ve been getting around 50mpg from town driving, but insurance is a bit more expensive than other group 10-11 mid-range bikes. Not having a fuel gauge is a bit annoying, but there is a low fuel light + a couple of trips so, once you know how much you can get out of a tank, it's easy to monitor roughly how many miles you've got left until you need to fill up. Discounting the above idiosyncrasies, this bike has so far actually been a lot of fun to ride. It looks good, feels solid and the raucous stock exhaust is load enough for other motorists to notice you and get out the way (although a louder aftermarket Mivv system is on my wish list). Whilst a bit clonky, the gear change is solid too – I liken it in feel to a big Tonka toy – and a lot better than the ratchety one on a 59 plate XJ6 I did my DAS on where you practically had to sprain your leg to get from 1st to 2nd! Although, on paper, this bike’s short on bhp, the low gearing coupled with decent torque make its power very accessible. With a redline of around the 8k mark, 1st gear is slightly short, but acceleration is still good up to about 70mph. Overall, this is a great bike if you’re planning on fast town and A/B road driving. If you’re more of a slow speed filterer or do lots of motorway driving, I’d recommend going for something with a straight four cylinder engine.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 Restricted MT-03
24 December 2011 by

Had my 33BHP restricted MT-03 for a few months now. One of the most beautiful bikes I have ever seen. It's fantastic around town. Loads of torque and is almost as agile as the DR125 I was riding before. Wide bars are both a blessing and a curse making the bike nimble at low speed but a little too wide to filter sometimes. Looks and sounds amazing. Out on the A-roads the bike handles well in the bends but will not be powerful enough to satisfy anyone who likes to ride quickly. My only other problem with the bike is that the throttle can be quite snatchy. Not had any problems with build quality, just a touch of rust on the exhaust manifold. Fantastic bike, just know that its about low down grunt for cities and twisting roads and not about power and top speed. A great bike for restricting as it still has bags of torque. Will max out at 85MPH on the flat when restricted, solo or two up.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 MT03
22 April 2010 by mariov

I got my MT03 1 1/2 years ago. Done 5000 miles on it and indeed is a great "little" bike. The good things: 1. Looks .. Yeah I find its looks amazing. 2. Riding position. Excellent for me... 3. Handling ... Like most said very very good handling. 4. Did I say looks ;) 5. Comfy .. Very comfy 6. Give it bends and traffic and it will smoke it. With a big smile. 7. Engine very reliable. 8. Low revs fun. Bad things: 1. Lets face it, its gutless. Sometimes you have scooters over takes you when you are full throttle. I do 30 miles a day on it and 20 miles are on M4... Prior hitting the highway I am king of the road. Hit the highway and you better move on the left lane ... It goes up to 80 - 90 "easily" but it is tiring 2. It is not make for 2 up .. Very small seat at the back not comfy.. 3. Gear box very very flaky. Gears don't go in correctly have to release clutch few times to engage gear on some occasions. Out of the bad things only one is really bad and that is the performance. I would highly recommend it if you are a city rider . The highway is barebable if you do it every now and then not every day. Will I swap it for anything else? When I bought it, the XJ6 (naked) wasnt out so maybe I would have gone for that but still the looks of the MT03 is something that did it for me and still does.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 great bike-if you use it as intended
01 March 2010 by

Had mine for a year now from new. Paid £3999 over 3yrs interest free - they're nearly £7000 now!!!. Totaly reliable (covered 11,000 inner-city miles without a glitch). Pretty good build quality (apart from some flaky paint on the oil sump). Huge fun because of its super agility, wonderful noise (akras a must), and good low to mid-range punch. But it's not meant to be a high speed bike and it is not intended for anything but the shortest of motorway hops.Overal, I would recommend the Mt-03 to anyone looking for an involving, well built and rare-to-see (on the roads of London anyway) bike. But buy a well kept 2008 bike with akras already fitted and save a fortune.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
3 out of 5 Italian electrics?
07 January 2010 by xape

Great little handling bike, but I wish I'd been able to take it on some faster roads when I test drove it. I traded my CBR600 in for the MT-03 as I wanted something with more low down torque for traffic but once I got used to it I found it severely lacking. I have no idea how mcn gave the engine 4 stars. The MT-03 is great from 0-30 but from 40-90 it's stupidly slow. I would open it up on bigger more open roads and accelerating cars could still overtake me, very embarrassing. I also had nothing but problems with the MT-03, especially electrics. Bought it for 3k in Oct 2008, and by Oct 2009 I had spent just under 1.5k on repairs (my fault for going to official yamaha garage). Went through three batteries at £150 a time from due to the rectifier/regulator keep blowing (£75) on a monthly basis (was covered under warranty subsequent times, but it spent ages in the garage). It constantly stalled on me, and I never got this fixed I just had to live with it apparently it's a single thing, but I suspect the electrics as it always improved after getting the wiring loom replaced (3 times). Although not quite as bad, it's also has very dodgy fueling from the on board computer which makes it surge/hunt between 3-4k rpm. Apparently there's nothing yamaha can do about this, but it makes it very annoying to drive at 30mph in the right gear as it's constantly changing speed. The last most annoying thing was overtaking on the MT-03. with the red line at 7.5k rpm you will more often than not have to change up a gear while overtaking. I constantly had to abort overtakes as the gear change would slow me down too much. Admittedly that's a side effect of my ex dispatch riding, but it's still annoying and forces you to drive likes it's sunday all the time. When you're riding it, it sounds great. But I realised when riding behind another MT-03 one day it actually sounds like a ball bearing in a tin can to everyone else. A lot of complaints here, but if you don't mind the total lack of power (new rider) and you get one without reliability problems (or have warranty) then you could be very happy with the MT-03.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 2 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 2 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
1 out of 5 Not good reading...
16 December 2009 by Hedgehog5

Full report reads... warranty replaced items list :- front wheel + bearings(x2), left fork leg, left caliper, front brake disks & pads, headlight unit, odometer, left & right handlebar switches, battery(x2), wiring loom (x2 or 3), rectifier, all locks & keys, engine rebuild including new barrel, piston, etc, rear wheel + bearings(x3), silencer, tail light unit (x2), pillion footpegs (x2). Off the road for 12 wks in 26 months & 32k miles of ownership. At the end I was just waiting for the next thing to go wrong & had no faith whatsoever in the bike being able to get me to my destination... still great handling tho'. I was left high-&-dry by Yamaha UK, net result I will never buy a Yamaha again. Shame really, I liked it when it ran.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 1 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
1 out of 5 Not good reading...
16 December 2009 by Hedgehog5

Full report reads... warranty replaced items list :- front wheel + bearings(x2), left fork leg, left caliper, front brake disks & pads, headlight unit, odometer, left & right handlebar switches, battery(x2), wiring loom (x2 or 3), rectifier, all locks & keys, engine rebuild including new barrel, piston, etc, rear wheel + bearings(x3), silencer, tail light unit (x2), pillion footpegs (x2). Off the road for 12 wks in 26 months & 32k miles of ownership. At the end I was just waiting for the next thing to go wrong & had no faith whatsoever in the bike being able to get me to my destination... still great handling tho'. I was left high-&-dry by Yamaha UK, net result I will never buy a Yamaha again. Shame really, I liked it when it ran.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 1 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
4 out of 5 Licence friendly fun
07 December 2009 by

Down sized from a ZZR600 due to not being able to safley exploit engine performance on public roads! I'm not boring, I just value my licence!!! Bought the Mt-03 1 1/2 years ago and have covered 10,000 miles. Apart from replace the cush drive at 4000 miles she has been no problem. Survived a 5 day 2600 mile trip around Scotland carrying all required kit + camping gear! Yes it is compromised due to lack of fairing and only having 1 lung and if you bought one of these for high speed cruising then you would be sorley disappointed.....but that's not the point. If you want something that's a little quirky and stands out from the crowd and have been there and done that with the speed thing and are more into 'riding' motorcycles, then you'd probably enjoy the MT-03. Handling is spot on, engine performance pokey, cruises at 75-80mph all day and gives you a commanding view of the road ahead. No better bike for blasting around the Dales (or Scotland!). A very soulful (for a Jap bike!!!) motorcycle.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
1 out of 5 18 month update...
20 January 2009 by Hedgehog5

... a string of major faults have continued to leave this bike off the road for longer periods of time (8wks in 18 months of ownership)... I haven't rode it yet this year because it's in having warranty work done. A letter to Yamaha reveals that they are not unaccustomed to bikes being off the road for this period of time & are unwilling to do anything about replacement transport. My advice holds.. do not buy a Yamaha if you need your bike as reliable transport. Full report will follow.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 1 out of 5
Value vs rivals 1 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
3 out of 5 After 1 year...
25 October 2008 by Hedgehog5

... this bike has proved itself not to be the all-rounder that it's made out to be (unless you do 4000 miles a year)... constant problems... wheel bearings, 2 wiring looms, new clocks, battery, & a chain made of elastic. The overall build quality is appalling... this bike is not up to all year use. On the plus side you won't find a better handling bike & the engine is spot on & faultless.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 1 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
4 out of 5 Great fun
18 October 2008 by Martinthevet

Great fun around the lanes and town. I had hoped to commute on it but felt vulnerable on the motorway.Big problem with engine cutting out when hot and filtering in traffic, told by local dealer this was 'an unresolvable problem with this single'. Very jerky at constant speed, engine constantly 'hunting' up and down the revs. I could't live with this but its the first injected single I've had. Just swapped it for the ZX9

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 2 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 fun bike
23 June 2008 by mibattack

A very good beginger or back to bike Very easy , very funny, ride as Supermotard or sports bikes. And good for your driving license. You do not loose to much points with this one. Good equipment, good breakes, engine a bit low HP. Fast on corners. the price is a bit to high.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 Flippin Heck
19 August 2007 by lahDdah

I have just spent an hour and a half on one of these blasting round the lanes and A roads in Kent. Top fun all round. The MT-03 has plenty of go and even with my huge bulk could top 98 with enough of a run up and me sitting bolt upright. There would have been a bit more but I didn't want to get down to it.. seemed a bit futile on this kind of bike. I was easily able to keep up with motorway traffic. 80 is easy, 85 is a bit vibey but perfectly possible. The handling was very light and stable even though I was on and off the power. There is tons of leverage available through the wide slightly turned out bars and their position plus the fact that there is very little of the bike in front of you gives you a feeling of flying through the countryside. (Think Leo & Kate in that scene in Titanic but with a motorcycle soundtrack instead of Celene Dion + lots of squashed flies on your teeth and you won't go far wrong) The sound is another thing. Surely Yamaha must be slipping the type approval people a bung for the noise this thing makes. The twin silencers give out a lovely throaty bop bop and you get the full benefit overtaking or riding through roads with walls or built up areas. Coming off the power and shifting down they even pop on the overrun. Brake and running gear is excellent. The front brakes can easily lock the front wheel but feel sensitive and progressive. They are floating rotors so you would expect them to be good. There is plenty of rubber up front and the rear can be slid perfectly under control super-moto stylie. Tubeless tyres on pretty alloys complete the set. The instrumentation is spartan but the tacho is prominent to keep the motor in its sweet spot. I didn't look at the speedo much but its clear and easy to read albeit a bit small. Everything glows red at night. Build quality seems very good indeed and the whole package hangs together very well indeed. You can also trick it out with Akra's and lots of hi-tech goodies to customise yours from the official Yamaha catalogue. I am told the service intervals are 6000 miles apart so running costs should be minimal with only one of everything to service (except tyres of course) I recommend everyone rides one as soon as possible. I liked it so much I have just bought one on the UK 0% over 30 months deal and have traded in my much faster, more in yer naked sports bike. I may regret not having both but the MT-03 is a stonking bike that I can ride just as fast 90% of the time and saves me money on tyres, insurance and running costs all the while. The other 10% I was breaking the law anyway and it was getting hard to hold on to the triple and my licence! Now I have had mine for about a month. I agree it could do with a bit more top end speed but everything else is a total hoot. Chicken strips disappeared whilst running it in!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 Flippin Heck
19 August 2007 by lahDdah

I have just spent an hour and a half on one of these blasting round the lanes and A roads in Kent. Top fun all round. The MT-03 has plenty of go and even with my huge bulk could top 98 with enough of a run up and me sitting bolt upright. There would have been a bit more but I didn't want to get down to it.. seemed a bit futile on this kind of bike. I was easily able to keep up with motorway traffic. 80 is easy, 85 is a bit vibey but perfectly possible. The handling was very light and stable even though I was on and off the power. There is tons of leverage available through the wide slightly turned out bars and their position plus the fact that there is very little of the bike in front of you gives you a feeling of flying through the countryside. (Think Leo & Kate in that scene in Titanic but with a motorcycle soundtrack instead of Celene Dion + lots of squashed flies on your teeth and you won't go far wrong) The sound is another thing. Surely Yamaha must be slipping the type approval people a bung for the noise this thing makes. The twin silencers give out a lovely throaty bop bop and you get the full benefit overtaking or riding through roads with walls or built up areas. Coming off the power and shifting down they even pop on the overrun. Brake and running gear is excellent. The front brakes can easily lock the front wheel but feel sensitive and progressive. They are floating rotors so you would expect them to be good. There is plenty of rubber up front and the rear can be slid perfectly under control super-moto stylie. Tubeless tyres on pretty alloys complete the set. The instrumentation is spartan but the tacho is prominent to keep the motor in its sweet spot. I didn't look at the speedo much but its clear and easy to read albeit a bit small. Everything glows red at night. Build quality seems very good indeed and the whole package hangs together very well indeed. You can also trick it out with Akra's and lots of hi-tech goodies to customise yours from the official Yamaha catalogue. I am told the service intervals are 6000 miles apart so running costs should be minimal with only one of everything to service (except tyres of course) I recommend everyone rides one as soon as possible. I liked it so much I have just bought one on the UK 0% over 30 months deal and have traded in my much faster, more in yer naked sports bike. I may regret not having both but the MT-03 is a stonking bike that I can ride just as fast 90% of the time and saves me money on tyres, insurance and running costs all the while. The other 10% I was breaking the law anyway and it was getting hard to hold on to the triple and my licence! Now I have had mine for about a month. I agree it could do with a bit more top end speed but everything else is a total hoot. Chicken strips disappeared whilst running it in!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 Big Thumper...
12 August 2007 by Hedgehog5

I moved from larger bikes in search of something different & I found it in the MT. Great handling, solid engine, but no good on m-ways. Made for tight bends & less than perfect roads... a good real world bike.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 MT-03 well put together, dealer was really great.
20 September 2006 by douetilr

Nice to be back on a bike again, despite mild state of tune pulls well & on our crowed London streets is more than enough. Brings a smile to my face on every ride, however accessories are way over priced, £87.99 for a fly screen, tut tut Yamaha! Strengths: Light clutch, manouvreable, great low speed balance, adequate power & great looks. Loves corners too. Weaknesses: Fuel injection not brilliant, wide bars can be a pain whilst filtering, mirrors not to good either.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Ex-demo with all the extras. Havent smiled so much in years
30 August 2006 by crustyclan

Love sports bikes? Fed up of looking out for speed cameras? Want a laugh, just like when u first learnt to ride? Take one for a test ride. Re-tune your brain. Nail it round your town/city centre, or down a back lane. Just smile. Strengths: Nimble steering. Grunty motor and still looks kind of cool. Weaknesses: You wont want to go to far to fast (saves your licence).

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
Back to top