KAWASAKI Z1000 (2007 - 2009) Review

Year: 2007

Stonking engine but on the heavy side.

Version: naked

Year: 2008

Annual servicing cost: £200

Great al rounder

Buying experience: Dealer ,I think I paid £4000 a few years ago ,without checking the paperwork.

Version: Peperami

Year: 2007

Getting on a bit condition wise and has been used evey day buy a few owners. Some wally fitted a scott oiler....

Buying experience: See it in Simply bikes in Cheltenham up for £4500. They told me they don't offer test rides. I paid £4350 for a 2007 with 13,700 miles. The sprockts were shot, that I'd missed, along with a few paint chips, and the clutch was slipping slightly, that I missed too. But it had new tyres with FSH. It looked mint but in the daylight it wasn't. .

Year: 2007

Annual servicing cost: £200

Visually appealing & functionally sound! I bought the unit with only 5000 miles on it.

Buying experience: I bough tit from a guy who took care and babied this machine. I had many options but price was a big motivator. The advertised price was $5500.00 Cdn with 5000 miles on it. I paid $5150.00 Cdn for it.

Year: 2007

Looks great, huge power for an upright bike, seat is terrible though, very uncomfortable, mine is going to be modified.

A whole lot of nonsense has been written about the Z1000, particularly by those proposing to compare it with the much lauded Speed triple. Well, I have now owned both (first the S3, which I sold as I needed a tourer at the time, and presently the Z1000), for about the same time now (around 6 months). What I can say in earnest is this - the idea (seemingly popular at present) the the S3 is the better bike is utter nonesense. There significant differences and these may appeal or not, depending on your preference. Firstly style/design: Hands down for me the 'transformer' looks of the Z knock the socks off the S3. The S3 just looks like a cobbled together home garage project, great if you like this and many do, but for me it was a minus even before I rolled it out of the showroom. By comparison the Z looks intergrated, designed, focused, a little outrageous, but generally very well finished. You might hate the looks of course, but if you love it you will love it to death. Secondly, the motor. Now we all know how great the S3 motor is, and indeed it is. It has a linear torque band like no other motor and when you let it go it will fly for sure - smooth, predictable, usable, power, etc - all such acolades are justified. The Z motor is a different beast altogether. Apart from being around a 100cc down on the S3 (which many seem to overlook?) this is a motor with clear racing DNA. Yes, it has been 're-tuned' as they say, and it does deliver usable torque through low to mid range revs. But this is still very much a ZX9r motor - it really wants to rev (even though it pretends not to). Now, when you cook this motor up a whole lot of differnce (compared to the S3) becomes apparent. Docile (ish), even well behaved (sort of) in the low to middle revs, the motor becomes positively ferocious if you unleash it. Get it in the upper rpm and it pulls like raging, snorting, lunatic bull. Its not 'better' than an S3, it is 'different'. If you like this kind of 'hit' (and I do) then you will favour the Z, otherwise the predictable power delivery of the S3 will suit you. Suspension/handling: the S3 is better - just. Another big pile of poo is bandied about on this one. Out of the box the S3 is better set up, it feels more planted, is confident, and can be usefully tweaked to be even better. The Z, on the other hand, is a bit of a mixed bag. It needs some adjusting for most, it seems, to get it right. for me, however, the factory settings are not far off. Lack of compression adjustment is a minus but the Z generally turns in a little faster than the S3, although there seemed little between them in my opinion. In truth I find the front end on the Z a little skitish (both bikes are, but more so the Z) although I think a steering damper might sort this out and I am considering this as a later mod/addition. Overall, however, and once set up the differences, for me, between these two bikes in this regard were minimal - both would benefit from suspension upgrades, but in truth this would be mostly for track as opposed to roadwork. I could go on...but I won't. Bottom line? Pay your money, take your choice...enjoy! Both are fabulous bikes,in the same way and in different ways, if they are your cup of tea of course! Both are my cup of tea but I personally think the Z has the edge.

HEY, This has gota be the best yet! I love it. Plenty of torque, handles excellent, brakes, goes when you want it to, good fuel consumption, STYLE plus. Mine is black, bought new in July 2007, 17,000km and still looks & goes like new. My son said, "Dad, that is just the best looking naked" I didn't argue with that.

Basically if an R1 and a bandit was out one night getting pissed and they ended up in bed together their kid would turn out to be a Z1000. It has the best of both, the performance and handling that comes very close to a sport bike plus the funfactor and comfort of a nakid bike. the only draw back i have seen so far is a bit of a kandle bar wobble under very hard acceleration and i personaly think the rev limiter kicks in a bit too soon (or i might just be riding it too hard lol)

I found the crankcase covers very prone to chipping, suspension was like a trampoline untill I got it set up correctly - factory settings are absolutely nowhere near. Bits of rust starting to eminate from welded joint on the frame after only 12 months. Not the usual Kawasaki quality I'm afraid. Goes and stops like stink though and looks the dogs !

Had my Pearl White ABS one for a month now (and it`s a good job it`s pearl white cos I love it THAT much....) and gotta say it`s brilliant! Easiest bike to ride I`ve ever had and goes like a banshee. The motor is utter madness, yet sounds like a turbine. I found the suspension a bit bouncy for my light frame, but softened the front spring by one turn, and the rebound by half a turn and it makes the world of difference. Some say the handling is a bit strange but I find it fine. I`m no knee slider anyway. My only gripe is the rock hard seat. Pretty uncomfortable after about 40 miles, and I`m riding down to Brindisi in August! Lor!

My kid still hopes it'll turn into a big robot. What is it with Kawasaki? Is it just me or do they make the sexiest bikes ever? Add in a 600 quid discount and interest free credit and this has to be my perfect bike, until the Z1400 comes out of course.

Goes like stink, looks amazing, does everything you want it to and more. You can haggle some great deals so ignore all the cr*p about not value for money….Two gripes: 1 - the suspension is set-up so the bike is like a bouncy castle when at pace – but you can get that dialled out. 2 – if you want to walk like John Wayne after 100 miles then this bike achieves it hands down. At risk at sounding a “big lassie” it’s like sitting on a brick, however I splashed out on a Baglux Seat. Not cheap but now it feels like a couch and me-erse thinks I am using padded quilt bog-roll every time I get on it!!

I had an old type Z1000 on an '04 plate. It was good but my god is this better. Buy one on 0% or an ex-demo and they're good value too. The bottom end is much improved and low down grunt and fuel injection is truly mind opening. Get one in moody black if you must but "Mad as a farty Orange" flatters the bike better. It looks trick, is perfect for commuting, goes like stink and if ridden well will embarass more sporting kit. It's a shame they haven't fitted a hugger as standard like the old one. Buy one and it'll put a smile on your face. Guaranteed.