Honda Dominator 650 (1988-2001) Motorcycle Review

Highlights

  • The definitive urban trailie
  • Punchy power delivery, upright riding position
  • Typical robust Honda build quality

At a glance

Owners' reliability rating: 4.2 out of 5 (4.2/5)
Power: 43 bhp
Seat height: Tall (34.6 in / 880 mm)
Weight: Low (368 lbs / 167 kg)

Overall rating

Next up: Ride & brakes
3 out of 5 (3/5)

The Honda Dominator 650 (code name Honda NX650 Dominator) is the motorcycle that defined the ‘urban trailie’ craze of the Nineties. Beloved by town-bound motorcycle couriers and B-road hackers thanks to its punchy delivery, rufty-tufty build quality and commanding riding position the Honda Dominator still makes its mark as a value-for-money commuting motorcycle.

Ride quality & brakes

Next up: Engine
3 out of 5 (3/5)

The whole motorcycle verges on the budget, but providing you don’t ask too much of the shock or forks you’ll be OK. The Honda Dominator's shock is weak and off-road miles will knacker it in triple time. Ditto the rear sub-frame, which seems to be made of silver-painted cheese. The Honda NX 650 Dominator's teeny nose fairing does its job up to around 80mph – after that you’ll be pressed into the familiar flying cruciform so beloved of naked motorcycles.

Honda Dominator 650 in blue and white

Engine

Next up: Reliability
3 out of 5 (3/5)

Most Honda Dominators will have had tough lives. Fact. Fortunately the SOHC, air-cooled single-cylinder motor is super-reliable and good for almost 100,000 miles, The only problem is overheating, which can cause the valves seats to drop, and oil consumption, which can border on the greedy. It’s got decent tug and away from motorways the Honda Dominator is a competent enough performer.

Honda Dominator engine

Reliability & build quality

Next up: Value
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The serious things to watch out  for when looking at a Honda Dominator are clunking motors, seized brake calipers, corroded tailpipes and damage sustained from off-road forays. Other than that it’s furred forks (protect them with clear nail varnish), chipped and worn cases, the odd busted spoke (run a pencil around them and listen for the dull ‘dung’ of a knackered one). Otherwise Honda Dominators will run and run.

Our Honda Dominator owners' reviews show nothing too concerning. One owner reports issues with the starter motor, but that shouldn't put you off as it doesn't seem like a prevailing problem.

Honda Dominator headlight

Value vs rivals

Next up: Equipment
3 out of 5 (3/5)

Buy a Honda Dominator as a winter hack or commuter you won’t go wrong – it’s the same engine that’s now found in Honda’s FMX650. But the Honda Dominator is way cheaper.

Honda Dominator back wheel

Equipment

2 out of 5 (2/5)

You get a sump and hand guards, a tacho, a single trip-meter and that’s your lot with a Honda Dominator. The pillion seat, pegs and grab handle are excellent on this motorcycle, though.

And of course, you can find a glut of optional extras on hand to personalise and improve your bike.

You don't get a lot of accessories on the Honda Dominator

Specs

Engine size 644cc
Engine type 4v single, 5 gears
Frame type Steel cradle
Fuel capacity 16 litres
Seat height 880mm
Bike weight 167kg
Front suspension None
Rear suspension Preload only
Front brake Single 256mm discs
Rear brake 220mm disc
Front tyre size 90/90 x 21
Rear tyre size 120/90 x 17

Mpg, costs & insurance

Average fuel consumption 50 mpg
Annual road tax £117
Annual service cost -
New price -
Used price -
Insurance group 11 of 17
How much to insure?
Warranty term Two year unlimited mileage

Top speed & performance

Max power 43 bhp
Max torque 39 ft-lb
Top speed 105 mph
1/4 mile acceleration 14.6 secs
Tank range 165 miles

Model history & versions

Model history

  • 1988: Honda Dominator introduced. Electric and kick start.
  • 1989: Grease nipple on rear shock, electric start only now.
  • 2002: Honda Dominator deleted from range.

Other versions

None.

Owners' reviews for the HONDA NX650 DOMINATOR (1988 - 2001)

5 owners have reviewed their HONDA NX650 DOMINATOR (1988 - 2001) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your HONDA NX650 DOMINATOR (1988 - 2001)

Summary of owners' reviews

Overall rating: 4.6 out of 5 (4.6/5)
Ride quality & brakes: 3.8 out of 5 (3.8/5)
Engine: 4 out of 5 (4/5)
Reliability & build quality: 4.2 out of 5 (4.2/5)
Value vs rivals: 4.4 out of 5 (4.4/5)
Equipment: 3.4 out of 5 (3.4/5)
5 out of 5 dommie survived epic overland..
28 August 2016 by tim

Year: 1998

Purchased as first full licence bike, for overland adventure to india- across europe,. turkey, iran, pakistan, and around india (5 months) in 2001. (pre 9/11 and Pakistan was mad and friendly, go if the world ever calms down,... but not now!) I have also crossed spain twice. Despite minimal mechanical experience, and a fair few slow speed crashes and multiple drops the bike never failed to start. Punchy power and robust. A faithful friend to two amateur bikers. Slightly naff paint job, but it will never be sold. Excellent machine.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Brakes pretty bad., seat uncomfortable

Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Some corrosion issues now at 15 years old but not obsessively cleaned admittedly.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5

Buying experience: dealer- price forgotten

4 out of 5 7 winters and still going strong
25 April 2009 by R1SquarePants

I've had my '97 Dommie for for seven years now and have used it as my all-year round transport to work. Rain, snow, sleet and ice the Dommie has seen it all and so long as I keep on top of the cleaning the finish still looks quite good; winter road salt will eat it alive. A regular change of the oil and filter ever 3,500 kms is an absolute must along with regular checking of the oil level. Mine doesn't seem to use much but I've heard stories of some engines being a bit thirsty and owners letting the level run low resulting in top-end rebuilds. Mines now done 51,000 kms and the only thing I can fault it on has been the starter motor letting me down but with new brushes it's working fine again. It used to be the butt of a few jokes from the guys at work who occasionaly commute in on their sportsbikes (only when the sun's shining of course), but with a couple of weekend rideouts with them along some twisty back roads they are a lot more respectful. It's gets a bit breathless on dual carriageways so keep clear of these whenever you can, but it is so gratifying to ride quickly along the back roads that afterwards it's a struggle to get my crash helmet off because of the huge grin I'm wearing. With 10bhp more and a better front brake this bike would be 10/10 I get just under 50mpg on the commute to work and 55mpg on less congested rides. Apart from a Hagon rear shock, the original saw one winter too many, the bike is standard. I keep thinking about swapping it for something else but I just can't bare to part with it. Perhaps I'll have to make some space in the garage for another bike.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
5 out of 5 Loved by it's owners!
14 February 2009 by OrangeSquash

The fact of the matter is; if you own a Dommie, you love the Dommie! When I bought this bike, I wasn't entirely convinced with it's looks and styling. I did not even get a chance to test ride it (restricted license), so it was a risk but I'm glad I went with it. It's an awesome bike. It's high seat is perfect for my 6'5" frame and even restricted it has enough horsepower and torque to pull my 20 stone bulk with ease. Being a Honda the build quality of the NX650 is outstanding. Mine unfortunately has a minor idling issue which I have yet to fix. Aside from this, the bike is solid. Built like a brick. I've dropped it more than once, resulting in only minor cosmetic damage to the fairings. Being a dual-sport, the bike is designed to take the occasional drop, the foot pegs and gear lever are spring loaded to prevent damage. The bike is perfectly suited to riding in winter, it is well balanced and the wide handlebars give great maneuverability. All in all this bike is a great all-year commuter. Rain or snow this bike performs. Full stop.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 Great value
18 September 2008 by peter rabbit

Seem to have bottomed in price now with most going at around £1500 mark - for which - if you get a good un - you will get a good useref reindly all year round fun bike. Not a scorcher performance wise but capable of cruising at 75-80 on the motorway if you must. High & long seat means good vision and room to move around or carry a pillion in comfort. Fancy little rack thing is more use than you might think. If you need a second bike or just fancy something different give the Dommie a go. I bought an Italian import which wasin better condition than similar aged UK models I had seen then. Chenged the light and put a MPH overlay on the KM speedo and Bobs yer Uncle as they say!

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 NX650 - Great Bike!
23 February 2008 by olylowe

Nice simple, single cylinder, reliable, cheap fun bike to run...what more could you want!?! OK, so maybe another cylinder, but then you wouldn't get 60mpg?! We all know Honda make great bikes of rock solid reliability, but it's fun to ride too. A high seat suits some (like me!), but a high centre of gravity means that its easy in the corners with a great engine note from the dual exhaust too (almost in comparison to the VTR!). The only downside to this bike is the vibration due to it being a single cylinder - however...I'm willing to forgive it that as otherwise it wouldn't be the frugal fun machine that it is! If Honda could make a V Twin version with the same mpg 5 stars would be garanteed!!!

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
Back to top