BMW R1200GS (2004 - 2012) Review

At a glance

Owners' reliability rating: 3.5 out of 5 (3.5/5)
Annual servicing cost: £350
Power: 100 bhp
Seat height: Tall (33.5 in / 850 mm)
Weight: Medium (439 lbs / 199 kg)

Prices

New N/A
Used £3,500 - £7,500

Overall rating

Next up: Ride & brakes
5 out of 5 (5/5)

The BMW R1200GS breezed into the motorcycle world in 2004 and changed it forever. It’s a genuine all-round motorcycle that’s equally at home on a trackday as it is on a grand tour. The BMW R1200GS' 1170cc Boxer engine is a pleasure to use, while the handling, braking, usability and comfort put this motorcycle in a class of one.

Watch the BMW R1200GS take on the Moto Guzzi Stelvio, KTM's 990 Adventure and the Triumph Tiger

 

Ride quality & brakes

Next up: Engine
5 out of 5 (5/5)

The BMW R1200GS exudes perennially unflustered excellence. The chassis is superb. The Telelever front end initially feels remote, but once you’re dialled in to the motorcycle and confident the BMW R1200GS can be leant and leant and leant. It’s 30kg lighter than the preceding model, the BMW R1150GS, and the servo-assisted brakes and (optional) ABS help haul the BMW R1200GS up with ease.

Engine

Next up: Reliability
4 out of 5 (4/5)

The BMW R1200GS' trusty oil/air-cooled SOHC Boxer motor is flexible, punchy and revvy all at the same time. The motorcycle's throttle is light, the response is instant and the power is all you could hopefully use in the real world. There are pleasantly few vibes, too, thanks to new-for-BMW balance shaft fitted to the BMW R1200GS.

Reliability & build quality

Next up: Value
4 out of 5 (4/5)

BMW motorcycle reliability is legendary, but it’s as much down to the comparatively gentle use the BMW R1200GS tends to get and the meticulous attention to the service schedule of  BMW R1200GS owners . Avoid any motorcycle that can’t back up its history with a full, dealer-stamped, motorcycle service book.

Value vs rivals

Next up: Equipment
4 out of 5 (4/5)

BMW R1200GS typically command top dollar for either new or secondhand motorcycles. But the good news is that you get back much more of your money when you sell the motorcycle than virtually any other motorcycle brand. Mileage is normally the bugbear of residuals, but BMW R1200GS buyers are much more tolerant, with only motorcycles showing over 50,000 considered high mileage. Find a BMW R1200GS for sale.

Equipment

4 out of 5 (4/5)

A man could beggar himself lavishing kit on his BMW R1200GS. Heated grips, ABS, crash bars, hard and soft luggage…but at least you get an ignition-based immobiliser and a height adjustable seat as standard on the BMW R1200GS. Compare and buy parts for the BMW R1200GS in the MCN Shop.

Specs

Engine size 1170cc
Engine type 8v Boxer-twin, 6 gears
Frame type Steel trellis subframe
Fuel capacity 20 litres
Seat height 850mm
Bike weight 199kg
Front suspension Preload
Rear suspension Preload, rebound
Front brake Twin 320mm discs
Rear brake 220mm disc
Front tyre size 110/80 x 19
Rear tyre size 150/70 x 17

Mpg, costs & insurance

Average fuel consumption 47 mpg
Annual road tax £117
Annual service cost £350
New price -
Used price £3,500 - £7,500
Insurance group 13 of 17
How much to insure?
Warranty term Two year unlimited mileage

Top speed & performance

Max power 100 bhp
Max torque 85 ft-lb
Top speed 136 mph
1/4 mile acceleration 12.4 secs
Tank range 206 miles

Model history & versions

Model history

2004: BMW R1200GS motorcycle launched.

Other versions

BMW R1200GS Adventure (see separate listing).

MCN Long term test reports

MCN Fleet: BMW R1200GS Rallye reaches the end of the road

MCN Fleet: BMW R1200GS Rallye reaches the end of the road

I’m not a monogamous rider. It doesn’t matter how good a bike is, I really struggle with the concept of only having one. I currently own four (a Ducati 996, Suzuki GSX-R750 ‘Slabby’, Honda VFR800FiW and Honda CB750 SOHC), but if you backed me into a corner and threatened me with the concept of singl

Read the latest report

Owners' reviews for the BMW R1200GS (2004 - 2012)

42 owners have reviewed their BMW R1200GS (2004 - 2012) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your BMW R1200GS (2004 - 2012)

Summary of owners' reviews

Overall rating: 3.9 out of 5 (3.9/5)
Ride quality & brakes: 4.4 out of 5 (4.4/5)
Engine: 3.9 out of 5 (3.9/5)
Reliability & build quality: 3.5 out of 5 (3.5/5)
Value vs rivals: 3.6 out of 5 (3.6/5)
Equipment: 4.3 out of 5 (4.3/5)
Annual servicing cost: £350
5 out of 5 Nine good years with a R1200GS
24 April 2023 by Steve

Version: Last of the Air/Oil cooled. Electronic suspension

Year: 2010

All in all, nothing compares: Plenty of power, great ride comfort, easy to have fun & scratch solo, great two-up tourer, economical 54+mpg is possible if not pushed hard. No nasty chain & sprocket hassle. Sadly, no cruise control either. Seemingly, every man and his dog’s got a beemer, now that tells a story! I’ve owned mine for nine years now and I still haven’t found a viable replacement despite wanting to, just for the sake of a change.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

One up and two up, ride in comfort until the tank is empty. 300 mile days are a breeze. (600 miles are do-able but not fun, at least for me!) Good throttle response, dollops of torque, wouldn’t be without traction control and ABS not intrusive but gives a sense of security (although only needed once in nine years)

Engine 5 out of 5

A bit more vibration than the R1200RT, (allegedly due to a smaller flywheel) Is that what’s known as ‘character’? I love the low-down grunt and linear power - I always short shift and the power is there, it just pulls - it’ll easily charge into the red line if that’s what you want. But why?

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Starter motor has always struggled to turn - probably has always been a duff one, but still working. Replacement tyre-pressure monitors are an arm and a leg to replace. Thankfully the originals did last for 10 years. Front alloy wheel died with corrosion causing a pin hole air leak about 10mm from the tyre valve - discovered when tyre pressure monitor was replaced and necessitated a replacement wheel. Ouch! The bike has always been kept in a garage, so corrosion at a minimum but two 20mm dia paint bubbles on the R/H rocker cover have appeared in the last 12 months

Value vs rivals 3 out of 5

Beware major 30k miles service requires almost a 2nd mortgage and tyre-pressure monitors pricing is a total rip-off, thankfully they lasted 8 years before they died.

Equipment 5 out of 5

Electronic suspension gives plenty of choice but I just leave it in ‘comfort’. Plenty of info to scroll through but I don’t really bother - I just leave it on tyre pressure display. (Probably influenced by having had a front tyre blow-out and a couple of punctures, albeit in the distant past) Metzler, Avon & Mitchelin all seem to work well, really like how the telelever fork doesn’t dive under braking, although the front end feel always seems a bit vague next to other bikes I’ve owned over the last 52 years

4 out of 5 Nice bike but I traded it in for a KTM.
20 February 2023 by Olle Viktorsson

Version: With lots of Touratech

Year: 2005

Annual servicing cost: £500

Fantastic ride but not faultless

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Stunning on sealed roads but too heavy on gravel and bad feel from the frontsuspension, when the road is soft I dont like the telelever.

Engine 3 out of 5

Sleepingpill

Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5

Oil leaking from the gearbox that made the clutch slip, otherwise ok after two years of ownership..

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
3 out of 5 Avoid
05 December 2022 by Shane

Year: 2008

Annual servicing cost: £700

Out of town, two up fully laden with the heavy vario luggage I can not imagine a better bike to be on. Impeccable hairpin handling and fuel economy into the 50's over 2000 Spanish miles. Back home commuting with the snatchy on/off clutch and shaft clunk in traffic not so nice.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

The most comfortable bike i have owned for distance, 500 mile days for both of us no problem. I can stand up for leg and arse relief so the stops are for the pillion usually. Two hours is ok.

Engine 3 out of 5

Poor at low speed, snatchy and clunky. Sweet spot is 70-85.

Reliability & build quality 1 out of 5

Where to start? Rear shock went at 22k, replaced with a Hagon unit with remote preload which has worked well for 30k. Both lambda sensors gone by 40k. Corroded wire somewhere in the loom also in the low 40k mark, expensive to find and rewire. Low oil pressure warning when full of oil constantly coming on, eventually traced to another electrical fault after replacement of oil pressure switch. "Ticking" noise with clutch out in neutral, gradually got worse over 20k miles, eventually traced to gearbox output shaft, clutch also replaced then a week later the shaft itself and the swingarm which the wildly thrashing shaft also took out. £.2.5k bill....

Value vs rivals 3 out of 5

Every 6k with every second one being major.

Equipment 3 out of 5

The standard screen works well for me (6'2"). Engine bars recommended for those red faced moments, had a couple of those. Tried several tyres but came back to the standard Metzeler Tourance as the best compromise between wear4 and grip. They really are very good. I disliked the "Next" variant of this tyre, fast wearing with no obvious benefits.

Buying experience: Private sale, I paid £5.300 for a 2008 model in 2018.

4 out of 5 Not a Landover but a GS
01 August 2022 by Chris Shawcross

Year: 2008

It's a do anything bike. You can get a great deal of fun riding sweeping bends and if there's a bit of gravel she hoists her skirt and gets on with it. You can work on it yourself you don't need a 12 year old with a computer. It is a heavy bike to move about and the seat is high so tip toing around when shuffling it about. It's an old fashioned boxer engine, not a smooth 4.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Excellent bike to ride long distances on. It's not uncommon to ride for 3+ hours before putting my feet down. I have ridden for 8 and 10 hour days with relative ease. And I am an old bloke!

Engine 4 out of 5

The engine is vibey. I would say it's like a diesel car lots of torque this means less gear changing as it will pull in almost any gear.

Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5

I had owned mainly Honda's prior to buying this new. The build quality against a Japanese bike is well poor. No stainless bolts and fragile paint, especially on the engine.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

I service the bike myself. Much much cheaper than a main dealer and I do things above those required.

Equipment 4 out of 5

I have the BMW Vario panniers. Not favoured by many,but they work. Extend them out and you can put helmet in and loads of gear for traveling. The single best add on is a mud sling front and back. Should be standard equipment. Saves the rear suspension and the front of the engine. A must have.

Buying experience: I bought new and had it delivered. 150 mile delivery but all went smoothly.

4 out of 5
08 July 2022 by George Alexandrou

Year: 2009

Annual servicing cost: £800

Only broke down 1 time something to do with ignition. Not bad for 12 years old

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5

Its a great bike and I am in love.

Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 Not perfect but addictive
08 October 2021 by Chris Shawcross

Year: 2008

It's been excellent for reliability. It is safe and comfortable to ride in any weather. Straightforward to maintain yourself.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Once I eventually got the bike set up for me, screen, seat and suspension, it is comfortable way to cover high miles. It is genuinely an all rounder, motorways, back roads or gravel tracks.

Engine 4 out of 5

Torquey engine makes it easy to ride. Not a high rev machine. Gear box is clunky it certainly not of Honda standard.

Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5

It's never let me down. It is a basic almost old fashioned type of bike. BMW have their own way of building a bike, if it needs 4 fixings let's make them all different, hard to fathom the logic.

Value vs rivals 3 out of 5

I service the bike myself. If I had to use a dealer, I couldn't afford it. They are expensive.

Equipment 4 out of 5

The comfort of the ride, seat, suspension, especially front suspension no nose dive under braking. Definitely have some form of fender extender front and back. Should be fitted as standard! Saves your rear suspension and front of the engine.

Buying experience: I bought from a dealer. A dealer at the other end of the country to me. They delivered the bike to me and the guy showed me the in's and out's of it.

5 out of 5 Old Man not doing Long Way...
19 March 2021 by Gavla04GS

Year: 2004

After years of sports bike I was trying to avoid adventure bikes but now hooked! The improved vision from the update position plus the instant grunt to overtake slower traffic and just get out of roundabouts makes my 80 mile daily commute a treat. Practicalities of luggage to carry kit plus get 40+ mpg. Heated grips as standard too.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

It won’t stand on its head or corner like an R1/ZXR but it will ‘make progress’ in the real world with poor surfaces etc better than a sports bike.

Engine 5 out of 5

Grunt from 30-70! Like a big twist and go.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

It’s had 6 users but only 36000 miles on a 17year old bike is testament to its durability.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

It’s so easy to look after with no complex electronics.

Equipment 5 out of 5

Heated grips are so obvious, plus the low maintenance of shaft drive.

Buying experience: I read guides on UKGSER.COM and knew I wanted one. I bought from Motorbikes4all following online advert. Pics and video didn’t do it justice but C-19 and distance prevented me seeing it first. Their support and excellent delivery service made it painless.

4 out of 5 All-conquering R1200GS
12 February 2021 by Geronimo

Version: Standard

Year: 2009

Annual servicing cost: £310

Great upright riding position giving unobstructed views of the road and surrounding environment. Comfy for all day riding and taking in high mileages. Loads of power / torque to handle easy two-up touring with luggage. Great reliability, so far, although genuine BMW parts are a premium. It's great handling and is excellent for the 'twisties' and then capable of going off-road as a bonus. True all-rounder. Pre-2012 model therefore has the unique BMW two indicator switches, like 'em or loathe them, you do get used to them. There are loads around and people say they are all too common, but I guess there is a good reason for that. It's my second one and I went from a newer model to an older one but still love it. I would recommend one to anyone.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Best on A and B road escapades with commanding views from a reasonably tall seat height, corners well and is easy to throw around and weight of bike hardly noticeable. Hasn't got the R1200RT's fairing protection for the long motorway hauls but reasonable for an adventure bike. Comfy for a tankful of petrol (around 200 miles) with some moving around required to alleviate the all too common numb bum feeling, otherwise very good ergonomics. No complaints from the pillion perch either. Brakes are excellent. Great all-round bike with the beauty of being able to go off-road too.

Engine 4 out of 5

Ironically also previously owned the R1200GS LC 2015 model (traded in for Triumph Bonneville which is no two up touring machine). Went back to the GS but earlier model (as got a great bargain), and not regretted this. Engine obviously not as powerful or smoother as the newer liquid cooled model but more than adequate. Great torque and pulling power two up and fully loaded. Bags of character from the twin and sounds great, nothing to dislike if you keep things in perspective.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

This bike was purchased secondhand a few years ago and did have some rusty bolt heads and some bubbling to the engine and shaft drive casings. It is now stored in a garage and hasn't got any worse. Otherwise plastics and frame have stood up well. Build quality appears good overall. It's never broken down in my ownership in almost 3 years. The last MOT highlighted the rear shock was on it's way out (which I have since purchased a Hagon aftermarket shock), and the petrol gauge has failed, which is apparently not uncommon but as this doesn't impact on the ride I haven't fixed this, I just keep resetting the trip each fill up.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

£310 = major service including valve clearances (£220 for standard service). Above service costs are non-BMW garage prices, BMW significantly more. Tyre's start from around £200/pair. Approx £350 to fix the fuel gauge at BMW garage. Rear shock from BMW would have cost around £850. BMW spares are usually premium prices and unless necessary sometimes pays to shop around for equally / better quality aftermarket spares.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Ergonomics and comfort best features. Equipment wise two switch indicators not to everyone's taste but other than that standard equipment is good and heated grips are excellent, typical for BMW. Has larger touring screen fitted for better wind protection, and a pyramid hugger to cut down on road grime on the rear shock which work well. Full BMW pannier and top box are just excellent, even if not the ubiquitous aluminium variety but they do the job and are 100% waterproof. Previously used Heidenau K60 Scout, which are excellent for a mixture of on / off-road use, if a little noisy. Currently running on Mitas E-10, which I feel don't give the same level of confidence / grip.

Buying experience: Bought private and paid £4500 for it 3 years ago this May (which I thought was a great deal at the time (advertised at £4800 originally).

5 out of 5
13 January 2021 by T

Year: 2012

Yes!!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 A dream machine. Most of my dreams are good, but there are always a few nightmares
15 August 2020 by Whitewater Savage

Year: 2006

Annual servicing cost: £60

Super comfortable dream machine to ride, superb brakes. Great looks . Poor fuel consumption (4.8 l /100km), My wifes Toyota does better. Too many electronic gremlins. Yes I would recommend the bike, but difficult to get as only, perhaps, 20 in whole of the country

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Superb on open tar roads, good on dry dirt, needs concentration on sand/ stoney tracks. Forget taking it on compacted wet dirt roads with the tyres I have on it. I do a 200km return journey on it a couple of times each week and 550km trip a couple of times a year, all tar, with a 15 min refuel and pee break at 250.

Engine 5 out of 5

Electronics aside, its like the proverbial Singer sewing machine. Gearbox clunky, certainly not as smooth as my old 1984 Tenere, also I'd have liked a lower first gear for the stop / start idiotic Nairobi traffic. A higher 6th gear on the highway would also be nice.

Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5

Regretfully, despite Ewan McK and Charlie B riding this model Cape North to Cape Town, (last half across Africa), with who knows how much backup and spares, this is NOT a bike for Africa. There just arn't enough people around who are able to fix it when, (not if), things go wrong. Similar problem with all the modern machines I suppose. Certainly not as "reliable" as my 1984 Tenere 600 kick start. Electronic key failed at 20k km, re-occuring problem with gear selector sensor, Fuel pump ECU (code10443). Blown light bulbs. Would I drive it Nairobi - Cape Town - probably not, but if so, only with a Land Cruiser for back up

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

I do all my own servicing using the GS 911 diagnostic tool so minimal cost here. Major service at 10,000 km intervals, oils and filter @5k, air filter every 2k. Why no replaceable fuel filter. Cleaning the sealed filter unit with injector cleaner additive gets done every 20k with the "dirty" Kenyan petrol and is time consuming and probably frowned upon by BMW in the UK. But it works

Equipment 5 out of 5

Michelin Anakee 3 tyres - SUPERB. 95% tar with little hard acceleration / braking - 25k front, 30k rear. Off road great when dry, sh one t when wet, will get the Anakee 80/20 Adventure tyre when next in South Africa. Nextbase dashcam camera saves a fortune in bribes to police where you can prove you were doing legal speed and he bull sh one t's you that you were 30 over. Also have a LED spot light bar.

Buying experience: Privately, second hand @ ten years old with only 20k on the clock. Paid equv of Stg 8.5k in 2016 following a spares problem with my 1985 K75, since resolved.

4 out of 5 Old r1200gs what more do you need
01 May 2020 by NEIL BRODIE

Version: R1200gs

Year: 2005

Annual servicing cost: £70

Corrosion all round but I use it all year

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Although it is 15 years old brakes are excellent and it comfortable for long journeys

Engine 5 out of 5

Meets my needs

Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5

Corrosion, fuel regulator, indicator switch but used in all weather

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Service my self not including brake pads and tyres

Equipment 4 out of 5

Vario luggage

Buying experience: Bmw dealer good service Douglas Park motrad East kibride great staff

3 out of 5 Triple beauty
03 April 2020 by Tony Lyle

Version: Triple Black TU

Year: 2011

Annual servicing cost: £250

Would prefer more toys and integrated electronics.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

ABS works very well. I’m biased towards the rear brakes and use pads up a lot.

Engine 4 out of 5

A good torquey motor with reasonable economy

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Good quality and reliability.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Self servicing saves money.

Equipment 3 out of 5

More desired.

Buying experience: Was bought for me by my children 😆

5 out of 5 Cant find anything to replace it with, only another one.
25 January 2019 by Dobknocter

Year: 2006

Annual servicing cost: £250

Cant give 4.75, had a few issues but overall does everything better than average.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Can't give 6 out of 5. I live in Cornwall, rode up to Scotland in one hit at high speed in comfort (can't say how fast but well over the border in 8 hours) then took twisting B roads down to the ferry port in Heysham, then on the ferry to the TT, once there spent a week watching the racing and GREENLANING, i had many people wondering how i managed to get up the rocky lanes over there but with weight comes grip. I find the Mitas E07 tyres very good. Around the roads in the west country i have left many faster bikes behind, I'm sure those wide handlebars and telelever suspension help through the bends. Does everything better than it should.

Engine 4 out of 5

Transmission takes a bit of getting used to, but for an air cooled twin it can shift on when required, loads of torque makes overtaking easy, and also has a bit of extra go over 7000 rpm. The front of the engine can suffer from corrosion but a fenda extenda can help with protection. The cylinder heads act as great leg rests for short times on the motorway.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Built well but the torx fastenings can be prone to round out if poor quality torx keys are used.Had the common ABS problem at about 35000m, but i had it removed for a fraction of the cost of repair. (have been riding for 37 years and never had ABS before unless you count an old tiger cub which you could never make the brakes lock no matter how hard you pulled the lever) Also had seals leak between engine and clutch housing (problem on early 1200s). These two issues cost me £750 but no issues in the last 15000m apart from wear and tear.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Even though BMW are not cheap when it comes to hourly charges, the servicing is not too expensive as you don't have to remove loads of bodywork to get to the engine. A full service with valves, balancing throttle bodies, fluids and filters cost just over £300.

Equipment 4 out of 5

The best thing i have is heated grips and a pair of tucano urbano handlebar mitts. (awesome) I now have a second set of wheels so i have knobblies (E07+) for laneing the winter roads down here in muddy Cornwall and road tyres for the rest of the year. As for accessories,if you think the bible is a big book, check out the Touratech catalogue.

Buying experience: Private purchase from a caring owner. Paid £3700 nearly three years ago. Bargain .

4 out of 5 Great bike and would recommend but not without occasional issues
27 July 2018 by Bucko1962

Year: 2007

Annual servicing cost: £500

Generally very pleased with the bike, it has taken me all over Europe but like most things is not without it's issues.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5

Ride quality excellent, let down by ABS issue mentioned which from research is a common problem that should have seen a recall to remedy.

Engine 5 out of 5

Excellent, tons of torque.

Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5

Broken down twice, both electrical but put me in a difficult spot. That's in 33,000 miles so could be worse. Some corrosion on bolts but main issue is the ABS that failed and was repaired but recently failed again.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Used main dealer for the first few years but very expensive. I found an ex-BMW trained mechanic who does an excellent job for half the price.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Buying experience: Bought from main dealer, the initial experience when buying was excellent, but then tailed off.

5 out of 5 Love this bike
06 May 2017 by Ali

Year: 2007

Annual servicing cost: £400

Character has it in droves, awesome when you drive it like you dont have to pay for it.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Problems more with the dealers pointing out what should be done, rather than what needs done. costs are extortionate but internet saves £ on ABS fixs, fixed mine for £24 against dealers 1200! and brake bleeding is easy not like it says on internet, just start at top and work down.

Value vs rivals 3 out of 5

New battery, shaft seal, but been quoted for rear disc and pads, rear wheel bearings and ABS which would have added £2000 if i had not been wise and checked out if they were really required. Sure there worn but, so am I.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Buying experience: Would buy another and would recommend, engine is a peach, if you are normal, and dont want 130+ Great bike for B roads and twisty As, you get home with your licence.

4 out of 5 Its a beemer but ........
26 October 2016 by Pod the Spark

Year: 2008

Annual servicing cost: £400

Nice bike but.......

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5

Premium brand - premium prices 😐

Equipment 4 out of 5

Effortless perfomance at any speed

Buying experience: Main dealer parts and servicing expensive. Considering brand reputation, the stupidest things fail - fuel gauge twice, final drive unit on a bike carefully ridden with low mileage. Could do better me thinks

4 out of 5 BMWR1200GS ready to explore and tour
10 August 2016 by Egone

Year: 2005

Annual servicing cost: £150

Excellent condition. Full luggage New tyres. A bike built to tour.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Excellent touring bike. At its true best in the country, mountain passes day ride outs to extended European trips. Comfortable cruising on motorways Great riding position.

Engine 5 out of 5

Does everything I ask of it on any roads from Finnish gravel roads to motorways. Never misses a beat

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Annual service with BMW

Equipment 5 out of 5

Many extras on the bike, full pannier set, crash bars, spot lights, gps,

5 out of 5 Dream bike!
24 March 2016 by TJ

Year: 2006

Annual servicing cost: £150

Perfect bike. I have ridden and owned all kinds of makes, models, types of bike and nothing has come close to be being as good as this bike at everything. Engine pulls throughout the Rev range, handles like its on rails, breaks are more than sufficient, comfortable on motorways, A roads, B roads, lanes and off road. Handles any situation you can throw at it.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Never missed a beat. 10 year old machine, looks factory new.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
3 out of 5 I got a lemon
19 December 2015 by Former BMW rider

Year: 2005

No more power than my '96 R11gs

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 2 out of 5

Claimed 20 hp more than my '96 R11gs, couldn't feel any difference

Reliability & build quality 2 out of 5

Hydraulic cam chain tensioners did not work at temps over 70 degrees Fahrenheit!!! Engine leaked oil, brakes warped, BMW wouldn't stand behind it, couldn't get rid of it quick enough.

Value vs rivals 3 out of 5

Too many trips to the dealer who would then say "they all do that".

Equipment 4 out of 5

Buying experience: Poor dealer service, BMW said that their dealers didn't have to work on it if they didn't want to!?!?

4 out of 5
01 September 2015 by AleksandrL

Year: 2007

good moto

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
3 out of 5 I wanted to like it
20 July 2011 by RoadcraftNottingham

Bought this bike as I'm an instructor and wanted an all round bike to replace my Fazer 1000 and Pan European 1100. At higher speeds and handling it's superb but due to the lean fuel injection mapping, it's terrible in town and at steady throttle setting. I tried de catting the headers, fitting a boosterplug electronic richener amongst other things and the local dealer said this is how they are so I sold it and kept my other bikes. If you like the smoothness of a Jap 4, leave this bike alone and if you say you don't like it in a review, you'll upset a lot of blinkered BMW owners.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 1 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 UNRELIABLE?
11 November 2010 by joe1964

I really don't understand when people slag-off the GS. The bike is the "ULTIMATE IRON HORSE". It was built for high mileage in comfort with enough power to take you and your luggage almost anywhere. It comes standard with steel hoses, hydraulic clutch, spoked wheels but tubeless and unique front suspension. It's a big bike but it weighs less than a Suzuki bandit and all the weight is in the lower part of the bike. Why do you think all the other manufacturers are TRYING to copy it? BMW have never claimed the bike can do what a trail bike can, it is for doing serious miles, ask kevin Sanders whom I think is the king of adventure biking, do you think if he thought the bike was unreliable he would set off from London to China on it? Get off your high horse and get on the iron horse mate! :)

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
2 out of 5 Unreliable
09 April 2010 by JosephYossarian

1 word sums up - Unreliable. Engine - sounds like a sewing machine but is surprisingly useful. Annoying flat spot though. R&H - Handling surprisingly good. You get used to telelever very quickly. Ride - standard sreen buffets your head. Equipment. Good, if you spend a bundle. Heated grips hotter on one side than the other. Q&R - Disasterous. Will never buy another BMW. Fuel pump relay issue appears to have finally been addressed. Only left me stranded 3 times (that point - add in all the other failures and it's the most unreliable machine I'veever owned) Value - Given Q&R, very poor. Quite a laugh on dirt tracks too, nut better if its OPM (other peoples machine)

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 1 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
5 out of 5 bmw 1200 gs
15 October 2009 by bigklar

6 words sum up this machine the best bike in the world

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 Chuffed To NAAFI Breaks
29 April 2009 by andy2210

Mines a 2007GS. 30k miles. Owned from New.Excellent machine. Only one Nark, Its easy to get the front seat off but try re-fitting it on the quick. What a twat!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 Well pleased
28 March 2009 by kaybe

Can do most things, and so a bike for all seasons. Very comfortable and in the twisties can easily keep up with most sports bikes. Loads of ways of personalising the bike, and support from a well subscribed dedicated web forum. Should have done it years ago. Mine is a 54 plate, in terrific nick.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 A good bike
05 August 2008 by Mjollnir

Ok if you can get around the stigma of either being accused of being old and wearing slippers, or being a Charlie and ewan wannabe, then this is quite a nice bike. it is very comfy and will go for miles and miles without any need to stop, unlike most bikes with a large tank, you can actually ridit for a full tank load. I still hate BMW switch gear though. burns a bit of oil if you park it up on side stand, but then most BMW flat twins do that. Build quality wasn't quite what I would have expected from the hype of BMW, but it wasn't bad.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 Brilliant - just a couple of niggles
20 May 2008 by rick-hard

My 56 plate bike was only a year old with 4500 miles when I purchased it from a main BMW dealer. The Gripes - So far only the original battery needed replacing under warranty. Anyone in the mid 5' range will have trouble putting both feet on the ground. It my opinion this will limit the sales appeal of this great machine. Being 6'1" I found the bike easy to mount/dismount ( with the seat in the lowest position) and both feet are flat on the ground I love the upright riding position which keeps me free from back and neck aches, and is great for long journeys. The boxer engine delivers a huge amount of torque at low and mid range which means if like me you are lazy, there is no need for too many gear changes - just leave it in 6th and open the throttle !.The claimed 100bhp is more than enough for every day use. With the panniers full, and 2 up the trottle response is still startling. With the original screen in the fully forward position, my shoulders and the top of my helmet tended to get plastered with bugs. I have now fitted a Wunderlich screen which is about 6" higher and makes all the difference. I was not that impressed with the dipped beam headlight, so I fitted an HID unit which has completely transformed the night vision. The exposed cylinder heads are very vunerable to damage if the bike falls over, and are veeery expensive to replace. Mine nearly fell off the stand in soft tarmac - so I fitted a set of engine bars just in case. In my opinion the R1200GS is a brilliant bike to ride, own and enjoy + the depreciation is very low compared to most Jap bikes.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
2 out of 5 Disappointed
29 February 2008 by hondated

Having read all the reviews ownersMCN included and watched Boorman and Mc Gregor I really wanted to like the bike when I took it out fora test ride today. Owning a Blackbird I was well prepared for to make allowances for the difference in performance etc. But although I only rode it for 50 miles I just could not get dialed into it at all. I loved the ability to be able to look at the scenery but the vibes and roughness of it just did not suit me at all.To be fair even though I have been riding for over 40years I did not feel that I had the capability to ride it how it should be ridden and I wonder if I should have been ringing its neck more.Each to their own though so if you do enjoy riding a GS good luck to you as for me I was glad to get back on my Blackbird.

Ride quality & brakes 2 out of 5
Engine 1 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 2 out of 5
Value vs rivals 1 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
4 out of 5 Great bike
26 February 2008 by

I'm on my third GS from new, one 1150 and two 1200's. The 1200 is a lighter and more agile motorcycle. An off-roader it ain't. Firstly it is too heavy and it gets heavier each time you pick it up! I spent a muddy wet day in the Brecon Beacons with Simon Pavey(BMW Off-Road Skills) and a 1200GS and by lunchtime I was fantasising about small, cute F650's and crying for my Mammy! Secondly its too expensive to be thrashing around the woods. The off-road capability isn't wasted however as the bike is supremely composed on poor road surfaces. It vibrates, this takes a bit of getting used to if you've come from a 4-cylinder. It goes around corners in a way that flatters the average rider. Of the five BMW bikes I've owned, my current GS is the only one to have caused problems - battery failure(a software problem according to the dealer) and a fuel pump sensor/widget(water damage - a common problem on the GS1200 and sorted on later models) The standard screen is a disgrace and vibrates intrusively at all engine speeds. I changed mine for the Adventure screen which is a huge improvement. Other mods are Wilbers shocks giving the bike a more planted feel and Akrapovic exhaust which gives a meatier sound. In Ireland the bike has been a victim of its own success with so many used models about that prices for second-hand bikes have become quite depressed. Overall I love it despite the flaws. If you have never ridden one, take one for a test ride and don't give it back until you have put 100 of the twistiest of your favourite miles on it. If you still don't get it then its not for you.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
4 out of 5 Good but not great!
17 February 2008 by kinnaidj

I've had the GS now for 2 yrs and put over 30K on. It's fast, very comnfortable and complete stable so a good road bike. It's unreliable and left me stranded once with numerous trips to the shop to fix this and that. The seat is crap so factor in a new Corbin or Bill Mayer seat in to the cost of ownership. Also, adding an underseat gas tank [Touratec] is a must to extend the range. Last but not least add an airflow screen. Bliss! Not wind blast at any speed, I can hear my i-Pod no matter how fast I'm going.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
1 out of 5 Good Bad and Ugly
26 November 2007 by cuscus

The BMW 1200GS is a cracking machine. It's a versitile, capable bike that provides many a nirvana moment. It's also as reliable, well built and potentially as expensive as a crack addict. Bought first bike in December 2004. Suffered multiple gearbox failures, electrical failures, battery failures (etc, etc, etc). Average distance between breakdowns under 1,000 miles. After gearbox number 3 imploded on the M4 less than 300 miles after installation BMW finally appreciated that this might have been a bit of a "friday afternoon" bike and gave me a rather advantageous trade in for another 1200GS The January 06 1200GS is twice as good as the bike it replaced. This one has almost averages 2,000 miles between breakdowns or failures. Things of note: * gearbox / clutch replaced under warranty (both bikes). Replaced more than once too... * fuel pump electrics failed (both bikes) * battery failed (both bikes) - In fact I've never made it through a winter without the bike dying. * Top boxes - three flew off the back of the bike before I got really fed up & BMW refunded my money. Design has since been changed. *ABS failed *gear position indicator failure (so bike won't start) *neutral indicator failure *sudden loss of power under acceleration *speedo / rev counter failure. *steering lock failure *total loss of electrics (no lights, horn, try stopping that bike without servos......) The only area of ownership that is more disappointing than the reliability is the "customer services" After 8 years BMW ownership I won't be getting another one (2 or 4 wheels). Back to Honda. Maybe they aren't as much fun or as trendy but they do appear to work!

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 1 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
5 out of 5 Great...no problems
22 November 2007 by gipsymagpie

My R1200GS was bought second hand and its been superb. However, looking back through the service manual it has had a few things replaced but for me it is awesome. I've done thousands of miles on it and I don't use my car any more. I have a full set of luggage and it lugs everything with ease. It is the first bike I have had that I want to lavish attention on. I keep it clean and service it on time. I love it.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
2 out of 5 Big Mistake!
28 October 2007 by jenzyme

Tried this out after having loved my superb blackbird for 3 years. Rugby injury to neck meant I needed a more upright riding position, and the R1200GS has a superb upright riding position - but that's where the compliments stop! It is plasticky and full of vibration through the handlebars from the rough boxer engine, especially when cruising at speeds above 85 - that is if you can stay on long enough enduring the wind buffeting and turbulence. It may have been great for Charlie and Ewan around the world, but that's because they were never travelling for any long periods of time above 40mph and passing any lorries! Considering the cost, BMW need to improve the basic screen size rather than expecting people to buy the after market additions; they need to change the engine for their new K engine which is brilliant; and they need to reduce the price! Thank God I didn't sell the Blackbird!!

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 2 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
5 out of 5 great all rounder
13 September 2007 by zardon

Well i have read horror stories on many places, yet I have owned 3 of these over the years and currently have a year old 06 model. I haven't had a single issue with any of them over the years so maybe I am lucky! I tend to run the bikes in quite hard and keep my eye on the oil. and stick firmly to yearly service periods. I know one guy who complained about his falling apart and he rode it for 2 years through the winter and salt doing his own servicing and not even cleaning it. sure enough his forks pitted and the machine wasn't prestine, but I get the feeling that some people feel just because its a BMW that it should just last forever without care and attention. This is obviously nonsense. Some tips? use high quality oil, get it serviced properly and coat it just before the winter with ACF 50 and clean it once a week. mine always looked like new! Sure I don't think the build quality is quite as good as the older models however with a little TLC they will keep fresh and the added engine power and lighter weight more than make up for this. Don't be put off by the comments in there, still one of the best all round bikes you can buy, especially if pick up a 1 year old minter with 5,000-10,000 miles on the clock.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
3 out of 5 Unreliable poor quality
26 May 2007 by patrud

As at least 2 other punters below, very disappointed with quality and reliability especially given that this is meant to be a premium product. Bought it with 1,100 miles on the clock from dealer and had it almost a year to the day. Since February replaced gearbox, clutch, rear frame (cracked), fuel electronics (water damage - replaced with 'modified' seal), headlamp failure (electrics), paint flaking off revealing corrosion. Luckily all under warranty and well looked after by dealer. Recovered once. Second time had to find workaround as BMW assist unable to help much at the time. Lost confidence and currently in discussion with BMW. Love it when it goes but in my opinion not worth the money spent and never expected so much to go wrong with a BMW. Never had issues with Jap machines before. Disappointed at being disappointed.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 1 out of 5
Value vs rivals 1 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
2 out of 5 Largely disappointing
24 April 2007 by

There are a number of things which you need to get used to with these BMWs if, like me, you have been accustomed to Japanese machines. After my 2 hour test ride I was impressed with the handling and comfort below 50mph but still unconvinced that it was the bike for me. Bolstered by all the glowing reviews and the knowledge that 2 hours wasn‘t enough to adapt, I decided to buy one and see if I could get used to it. The bike was very tall which made it and unwieldy when moving it round the garage. The height also made getting on and off difficult - the overall impression was that the bike is too big. I am 5’11’’ and had the standard seat on its lowest setting. I wanted a lower seat but the BMW dealer advised me not to get one as this would have less padding, so I didn’t bother. I found it difficult to get used to the indicators and always felt that having to use my right thumb to cancel robbed me of proper throttle control in a series of corners. Riding smoothly is the key to enjoying these bikes. This is difficult on a neutral throttle as the engine feels lumpy but is ok when accelerating except when you forget yourself and try to change up too sharply and let the revs drop too much, which results in an unsettling lurch to the right as the clutch engages. The front suspension set up keeps the forks from diving, but makes it feel that the rest of the bike pivots up and down behind the headstock. This means that on rough roads your body is bouncing up and down but your hands are not, which makes throttle control difficult, and given the snappy throttle response, a bumpy corner can be a bit of a nightmare without good clutch control. Having said all that, the handling was otherwise excellent, but I cannot say the same about long-distance comfort on the motorway. The wind buffeting and noise caused by the standard screen can be lessened somewhat (but not eradicated) by the use of Tobinators, but I think that BMW should have addressed this problem rather than let owners trying to solve it - chat rooms are full of talk about this issue and as far as I can see there is no universal cure. The bike also seems to be very prone to turbulence from other vehicles, so the bars often shake at motorway speeds. I found the seat no more comfortable than my previous GSX1400 and ZRX1200. Whatever the shortcomings of my previous bikes, they have all had some redeeming quality - style, performance, chuckability, exhaust note etc. which made them fun to ride. After a year I realised that I couldn’t use the word fun when describing the BMW, so I sold it.

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 2 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 2 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 Multi-Role
20 April 2007 by flyingdragons9999

A good multipurpose bike for all occassions. BMW should improve the seat and optional footrest availabilty for longer ride.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 very comfy
13 April 2007 by KWAK6ftRider

A great bike with a great engine, very comfy, you could ride it for days without ever being uncomfortable. It handles surprisingly well for such a big heavy bike. My only complaint is BMW insistance of using those cumbersome indicator controls.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 poor reliablity
22 March 2007 by smirky

I bought a 05 1200GS - i love the looks, handling, ride position etc, the only thing that lets it down is its reliablity, i have been stranded now 3 times (once in Italy) key immobiliser x 2, fuel pump x 1 - BMW Assist are very good at customer care but, a brand like BMW should in my opinion have better quality components on their bikes.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 BMW R1200GS
06 March 2007 by dave henderson

I have just ordered my 2nd GS after doing 14K miles on my 05 model I got 2nd hand. I have had a couple of warrenty issues but each time they have been sorted out without any problems. It is a fantastic bike for 2-up riding and excellant for touring. It could do with 20bhp more but otherwise I love it.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 5 out of 5
2 out of 5 Dire reliabilty problems!
08 September 2006 by minkyhead

Bought new 03. 2005 had failed clutch, throttle jamming on, brake failure, overheating. Refused to ride it after 2nd brake failure. Negotiated replacement with cash, adjustment,  failed fuel pump, stranded again. Bought a 4 year old valadero and sold the beemer 'nuff said, good when it runs though ...never buy out of warranty you have been warned! Strengths: Really good all rounder. Weaknesses: Terrible reliability problems, you have been warned!

Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 1 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
Back to top